Sign upLogin

44uk/nis-ruby

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 31 of 31 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def signature_unsafe(m, sk, pk)
        h = H(sk)
        a = 2**(@@b - 2) + (3...@@b - 2).inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + 2**i * bit(h, i) }
        r = Hint(
          intlist2bytes((@@b / 8...@@b / 4).map { |j| indexbytes(h, j) }) + m
Severity: Major
Found in lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb on lines 244..252

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 70.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def signature_hash_unsafe(m, sk, pk)
        h = HH(sk)
        a = 2**(@@b - 2) + (3...@@b - 2).inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + 2**i * bit(h, i) }
        r = Hint_hash(
          intlist2bytes((@@b / 8...@@b / 4).map { |j| indexbytes(h, j) }) + m
Severity: Major
Found in lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb on lines 231..239

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 70.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.build(props)
      attrs = props.inject({}) do |hash, prop|
        hash[prop[:name]] = case prop[:name]
                            when 'divisibility'  then prop[:value].to_i
                            when 'initialSupply' then prop[:value].to_i
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/nis/struct/mosaic_properties.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse_options has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def parse_options(options = {})
    defaults = DEFAULTS.dup
    options  = options.dup

    defaults[:url] = defaults[:url].call if defaults[:url].respond_to?(:call)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/nis/client.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse_options has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def parse_options(options = {})
    defaults = DEFAULTS.dup
    options  = options.dup

    defaults[:url] = defaults[:url].call if defaults[:url].respond_to?(:call)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/nis/client.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method mosaics_fee has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def mosaics_fee
      FEE_FACTOR * @transaction.mosaics.inject(0) do |sum, mo_attachment|
        mo = mo_attachment.mosaic_definition
        quantity = mo_attachment.quantity
        tmp_fee = 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/fee/transfer.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method request has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def request(method, path, params = {})
    log(method, path, params)
    if connection.remote? && local_only?(path)
      raise Nis::Error, "The request (#{method} #{path}) is only permitted to local NIS."
    end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/client.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def other_trans(transaction)
      transaction.other_trans.tap do |tx|
        tx.amount *= 1_000_000 if tx.respond_to?(:amount)

        tx.timeStamp = Nis::Util.timestamp
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/request/prepare_announce.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
    lib/nis/request/announce.rb on lines 60..67

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 39.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def other_trans(transaction)
      transaction.other_trans.tap do |tx|
        tx.amount *= 1_000_000 if tx.respond_to?(:amount)

        tx.timeStamp = Nis::Util.timestamp
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/request/announce.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
    lib/nis/request/prepare_announce.rb on lines 49..58

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 39.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def publickey_hash_unsafe(sk)
        h = HH(sk)
        a = 2**(@@b - 2) + (3...@@b - 2).inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + 2**i * bit(h, i) }
        _A = scalarmult_B(a)
        encodepoint(_A)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb on lines 151..155

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 35.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def publickey_unsafe(sk)
        h = H(sk)
        a = 2**(@@b - 2) + (3...@@b - 2).inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + 2**i * bit(h, i) }
        _A = scalarmult_B(a)
        codepoint(_A)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/util/ed25519.rb on lines 158..162

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 35.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def account_namespace_page(address:, parent: nil, id: nil, page_size: nil)
      request!(:get, '/account/namespace/page',
        address: address,
        parent: parent,
        id: id,
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/nis/endpoint/account/namespace.rb and 3 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 26..33
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 43..50

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def account_transfers_incoming(address:, hash: nil, id: nil, page_size: nil)
      request!(:get, '/account/transfers/incoming',
        address: address,
        hash: hash,
        id: id,
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb and 3 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/namespace.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 26..33
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 43..50

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def account_transfers_outgoing(address:, hash: nil, id: nil, page_size: nil)
      request!(:get, '/account/transfers/outgoing',
        address: address,
        hash: hash,
        id: id,
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb and 3 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/namespace.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 43..50

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def encrypt!
      bin_sk = fix_private_key(@private_key).scan(/../).map(&:hex).reverse.pack('C*')
      bin_pk = (public_key || @public_key).scan(/../).map(&:hex).pack('C*')
      @value = Nis::Util::Ed25519.encrypt(bin_sk, bin_pk, value)
      @type = TYPE_ENCRYPTED
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/struct/message.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/struct/message.rb on lines 33..37

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def account_transfers_all(address:, hash: nil, id: nil, page_size: nil)
      request!(:get, '/account/transfers/all',
        address: address,
        hash: hash,
        id: id,
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb and 3 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/namespace.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 9..16
    lib/nis/endpoint/account/transfers.rb on lines 26..33

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def decrypt!
      bin_sk = fix_private_key(@private_key).scan(/../).map(&:hex).reverse.pack('C*')
      bin_pk = (public_key || @public_key).scan(/../).map(&:hex).pack('C*')
      @value = Nis::Util::Ed25519.decrypt(bin_sk, bin_pk, payload)
      @type = TYPE_PLAIN
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/struct/message.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    lib/nis/struct/message.rb on lines 26..30

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 34.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method rental has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def rental
      if @network == :testnet
        if root?
          { fee: 100 * 1_000_000,
            sink: 'TAMESPACEWH4MKFMBCVFERDPOOP4FK7MTDJEYP35' }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/transaction/provision_namespace.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method apostille has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def apostille
    if @network == :testnet
      if private?
        raise 'Not implemented private apostille.'
      else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/apostille.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def account_mosaic_definition_page(address:, parent: nil, id: nil)
      request!(:get, '/account/mosaic/definition/page',
        address: address,
        parent: parent,
        id: id,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/nis/endpoint/account/mosaic.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    lib/nis/endpoint/namespace/mosaic.rb on lines 5..11

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language