File peertube-player.ts
has 409 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import './shared/context-menu'
import './shared/upnext/end-card'
import './shared/upnext/upnext-plugin'
import './shared/stats/stats-card'
import './shared/stats/stats-plugin'
Function getVideojsOptions
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getVideojsOptions (): videojs.PlayerOptions {
const html5 = {
preloadTextTracks: false,
// Prevent a bug on iOS where the text tracks added by peertube plugin are removed on play
// See https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/issues/6351
Function getContextMenuOptions
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private getContextMenuOptions () {
const content = () => {
const self = this
const player = this.player
Function content
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const content = () => {
const self = this
const player = this.player
const shortUUID = self.currentLoadOptions.videoShortUUID
Function disposeDynamicPluginsIfNeeded
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private disposeDynamicPluginsIfNeeded () {
if (!this.player) return
if (this.player.usingPlugin('peertubeMobile')) this.player.peertubeMobile().dispose()
if (this.player.usingPlugin('peerTubeHotkeysPlugin')) this.player.peerTubeHotkeysPlugin().dispose()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function loadDynamicPlugins
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private loadDynamicPlugins () {
if (isMobile()) this.player.peertubeMobile()
this.player.bezels()
Function buildPlayerIfNeeded
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async buildPlayerIfNeeded () {
if (this.player) return
await TranslationsManager.loadLocaleInVideoJS(this.options.serverUrl, this.options.language, videojs)
Function loadDynamicPlugins
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private loadDynamicPlugins () {
if (isMobile()) this.player.peertubeMobile()
this.player.bezels()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function tryToRecoverHLSError
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async tryToRecoverHLSError (err: any) {
if (err.code === MediaError.MEDIA_ERR_DECODE) {
// Display a notification to user
if (this.videojsDecodeErrors === 0) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.player.stats({
videoUUID: this.currentLoadOptions.videoUUID,
videoIsLive: this.currentLoadOptions.isLive,
mode: this.currentLoadOptions.mode,
p2pEnabled: this.currentLoadOptions.p2pEnabled
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76