Chocobozzz/PeerTube

View on GitHub
server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Function abuseReportValidator has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  async (req: express.Request, res: express.Response, next: express.NextFunction) => {
    if (areValidationErrors(req, res)) return

    const body: AbuseCreate = req.body

Severity: Minor
Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

    return next()
Severity: Major
Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
    Open

          return
    Severity: Major
    Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts - About 30 mins to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      const abuseGetValidator = [
        param('id')
          .custom(isIdValid),
      
        async (req: express.Request, res: express.Response, next: express.NextFunction) => {
      Severity: Major
      Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
      server/core/middlewares/validators/account.ts on lines 6..16

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 98.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      const addAbuseMessageValidator = [
        body('message')
          .custom(isAbuseMessageValid),
      
        (req: express.Request, res: express.Response, next: express.NextFunction) => {
      Severity: Major
      Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts and 3 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
      server/core/middlewares/validators/plugins.ts on lines 85..94
      server/core/middlewares/validators/plugins.ts on lines 139..148
      server/core/middlewares/validators/redundancy.ts on lines 130..139

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 76.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      export {
        abuseListForAdminsValidator,
        abuseReportValidator,
        abuseGetValidator,
        addAbuseMessageValidator,
      Severity: Major
      Found in server/core/middlewares/validators/abuse.ts and 2 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
      server/core/helpers/peertube-crypto.ts on lines 105..116
      server/core/middlewares/validators/plugins.ts on lines 206..216

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 49.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status