Showing 331 of 343 total issues
Function calculateVelocity
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
calculateVelocity: function () {
if (this.doneIterations().length === 0) {
return this.get('default_velocity');
} else {
// TODO Make number of iterations configurable
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function canEdit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
canEdit: function () {
var isEditable = this.model.get('editing');
var isSearchResultContainer = this.$el.hasClass('searchResult');
var clickFromSearchResult = this.model.get('clickFromSearchResult');
if (_.isUndefined(isEditable)) isEditable = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Complex method ProjectsController#join (20.6) Open
def join
project = projects_unjoined.find_by!(slug: params[:id])
authorize project
project.users << current_user
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method ProjectPolicy::Scope#resolve (20.3) Open
def resolve
if root?
Project.all
elsif admin?
current_team.projects
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
match_result(result) do |on|
on.success do |note|
render json: note
end
on.failure do |note|
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 23.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
match_result(result) do |on|
on.success do |task|
render json: task
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 23.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Complex method Statistics::variance (20.1) Open
def self.variance(enumerable, sample_size = enumerable.size)
slice = slice_to_sample_size(enumerable, sample_size)
total = slice.size > 1 && (total(slice) < total(enumerable)) ? total(slice) - 1 : sample_size
mean = mean(slice)
sum(slice.map { |sample| (mean - sample)**2 }) / total
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method IterationService#iteration_start_date (20.1) Open
def iteration_start_date(date = nil)
date = start_date if date.nil?
iteration_start_date = date.beginning_of_day
if start_date.wday != iteration_start_day
day_difference = start_date.wday - iteration_start_day
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def call
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
yield save_project
yield create_activity
yield create_ownership
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 20.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def call
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
yield save_task
yield create_changeset
yield create_activity
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 20.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Prefer annotated tokens (like %<foo>s</foo>
) over template tokens (like %{foo}
). Open
message: '%{value} is not a valid estimation scheme' }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use a consistent style for named format string tokens.
Example:
EnforcedStyle: annotated
# bad
format('%{greeting}', greeting: 'Hello')
format('%s', 'Hello')
# good
format('%<greeting>s', greeting: 'Hello')</greeting>
Example:
EnforcedStyle: template
# bad
format('%<greeting>s', greeting: 'Hello')
format('%s', 'Hello')
# good
format('%{greeting}', greeting: 'Hello')</greeting>
Place the . on the next line, together with the method name. Open
data.merge(state => current_iteration.
- Exclude checks
Use %i
or %I
for an array of symbols. Open
scope :in_progress, -> { where(state: [:started, :finished, :delivered]) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop can check for array literals made up of symbols that are not using the %i() syntax.
Alternatively, it checks for symbol arrays using the %i() syntax on projects which do not want to use that syntax, perhaps because they support a version of Ruby lower than 2.0.
Configuration option: MinSize
If set, arrays with fewer elements than this value will not trigger the
cop. For example, a MinSize of
3` will not enforce a style on an array
of 2 or fewer elements.
Example:
EnforcedStyle: percent (default)
# good
%i[foo bar baz]
# bad
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
Example:
EnforcedStyle: brackets
# good
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
# bad
%i[foo bar baz]
Space inside parentheses detected. Open
last_date = backlog_iterations.last.start_date + ( project.iteration_length * DAYS_IN_WEEK )
- Exclude checks
Redundant self
detected. Open
self.new(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username).send(message)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant uses of self
.
self
is only needed when:
-
Sending a message to same object with zero arguments in presence of a method name clash with an argument or a local variable.
Note, with using explicit self you can only send messages with public or protected scope, you cannot send private messages this way.
Example:
def bar :baz end
def foo(bar) self.bar # resolves name clash with argument end
def foo2 bar = 1 self.bar # resolves name clash with local variable end
-
Calling an attribute writer to prevent an local variable assignment
attr_writer :bar
def foo self.bar= 1 # Make sure above attr writer is called end
Special cases:
We allow uses of self
with operators because it would be awkward
otherwise.
Line is too long. [117/100] Open
@dummy_user ||= User.find_or_create_by!(username: "dummy", email: "dummy@foo.com", name: "Dummy", initials: "XX")
- Exclude checks
Redundant self
detected. Open
self.new(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username).send(message)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant uses of self
.
self
is only needed when:
-
Sending a message to same object with zero arguments in presence of a method name clash with an argument or a local variable.
Note, with using explicit self you can only send messages with public or protected scope, you cannot send private messages this way.
Example:
def bar :baz end
def foo(bar) self.bar # resolves name clash with argument end
def foo2 bar = 1 self.bar # resolves name clash with local variable end
-
Calling an attribute writer to prevent an local variable assignment
attr_writer :bar
def foo self.bar= 1 # Make sure above attr writer is called end
Special cases:
We allow uses of self
with operators because it would be awkward
otherwise.
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
@dummy_user ||= User.find_or_create_by!(username: "dummy", email: "dummy@foo.com", name: "Dummy", initials: "XX")
- Exclude checks
Align reduce
with @accepted_stories.
on line 106. Open
reduce({}) do |group, iteration|
- Exclude checks
Pass &:accepted_at
as an argument to sort_by
instead of a block. Open
accepted = accepted.sort_by { |story| story.accepted_at }.group_by { |story| story.accepted_at.to_date }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use symbols as procs when possible.
Example:
# bad
something.map { |s| s.upcase }
# good
something.map(&:upcase)