Showing 19 of 19 total issues
Constructor has 22 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sensorId: SensorId,
ownerId: SensorOwnerId,
ownerLun: SensorOwnerLun,
sensorNumber: SensorNumber,
entityId: EntityId,
Function resolveReferences
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
): Future[WSManErrorOr[ManagedInstance]] = {
val lookupRef: ManagedReference => Future[WSManErrorOr[ManagedInstance]] =
Memo.immutableHashMapMemo { mr =>
referenceResolver.get(mr, deadline)(ctx)
Function parseFullyQualifiedUser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parseFullyQualifiedUser(
fullyQualifiedUsername: String,
password: String
): PasswordCredentials = {
val (user, optDomain) = {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function kerberosCore
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def kerberosCore(clientToken: Array[Byte]): Either[Rejection, Token] = {
try {
val (maybeServerToken, maybeToken) =
Subject.doAs(
loginContext.getSubject,
Constructor has 15 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
baseSensorId: SensorId,
ownerId: SensorOwnerId,
ownerLun: SensorOwnerLun,
baseSensorNumber: SensorNumber,
entityId: EntityId,
Constructor has 14 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
guid: Option[Guid.Data],
assetTag: Option[ShortString],
serviceTag: Option[ShortString],
chassisServiceTag: Option[ShortString],
chassisRelatedServiceTag: Option[ShortString],
Constructor has 12 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deviceAccessAddress: DeviceAddress,
channelNumber: ChannelNumber,
acpiSystemPowerStateNotificationRequired: Boolean,
acpiDevicePowerStateNotificationRequired: Boolean,
controllerShouldBePresent: Boolean,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
object CommandResult {
implicit val decoder: Decoder[CommandResult] = new Decoder[CommandResult] {
def decode(data: ByteString): CommandResult = {
// val iterator = data.iterator
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
object CommandResult extends IpmiCommandResult {
implicit val decoder: Decoder[CommandResult] = new Decoder[CommandResult] {
def decode(data: ByteString): CommandResult = {
// val iterator = data.iterator
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Constructor has 11 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cpuId: Short,
platformId: Byte,
brandId: Byte,
maximalCoreSpeedOfCpuMHz: Short,
intelQuickpathInterconnectMegaTransactionsPerSecond: Short,
Function sequentiallyUntilSuccess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sequentiallyUntilSuccess[T](
tasks: Seq[() => Future[T]]
)(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): Future[T] = {
if (tasks.isEmpty)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
override def handle(callbacks: Array[Callback]): Unit = {
val credentials = tlCredentials.get
if (credentials != null) {
for (callback <- callbacks) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
inside(wsman.executeCommandOrError(target, query).futureValue) {
case \/-(result) =>
result.filterFor(ShellOutputStream.STDOUT) should include(file.getName)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
inside(wsman.executeCommandOrError(target, query).futureValue) {
case \/-(result) =>
result.filterFor(ShellOutputStream.STDOUT) should include(file.getName)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function validateRakp2Response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def validateRakp2Response(
rakp1: Rakp1_2.Command,
rakp2Result: Rakp1_2.CommandResult,
cipherSuite: CipherSuite
): StatusCodeErrorOr[Unit] = {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Anonymous function has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val (user, optDomain) = {
val atIdx = fullyQualifiedUsername.indexOf('@')
if (atIdx >= 0) {
val (u, d) = fullyQualifiedUsername.splitAt(atIdx)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validateRakp4Response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def validateRakp4Response(
rakp1: Rakp1_2.Command,
rakp2Result: Rakp1_2.CommandResult,
rakp4Result: Rakp3_4.CommandResult,
cipherSuite: CipherSuite,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def add(
inst: ManagedInstance,
list: ListBuffer[(String, String)],
prefix: String,
propertyRestriction: PropertyRestriction = PropertyRestriction.NoRestriction
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseInt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parseInt(value: String): Option[Int] = {
if (value == null)
None
else {
val parse: Integer = Ints.tryParse(value)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"