Sign upLogin

DeveloperCAP/MLCAT

View on GitHub
Star
lib/analysis/author/graph/generate.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Function author_interaction has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def author_interaction(clean_data, graph_nodes, graph_edges, pajek_file, ignore_lat=True):
    """
    Prints the number of strongly connected components,weekly connected components, number of nodes and edges from the author graph.

    :param clean_data: Path to clean_data.json file
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/analysis/author/graph/generate.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                    if json_obj['Time'] < time_limit:
                        # print("\nFrom", json_obj['From'], "\nTo", json_obj['To'], "\nCc", json_obj['Cc'])
                        from_addr = email_re.search(json_obj['From'])
                        json_obj['From'] = from_addr.group(0) if from_addr is not None else json_obj['From']
                        json_obj['To'] = set(email_re.findall(json_obj['To']))
Severity: Major
Found in lib/analysis/author/graph/generate.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Function author_interaction has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def author_interaction(clean_data, graph_nodes, graph_edges, pajek_file, ignore_lat=True):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/analysis/author/graph/generate.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          for i in range(1, num_vertices+1):
        line = lines_in_file[i].split()
        line[1] = "\"" + line[1] + "\""
        del line[2:]
        line.append("\n")
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/analysis/author/graph/generate.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
      lib/analysis/author/community.py on lines 34..39

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 96.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status