Showing 14 of 20 total issues
Method remove
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove(relation, role_name, resource = nil)
cond = { :name => role_name }
cond[:resource_type] = (resource.is_a?(Class) ? resource.to_s : resource.class.name) if resource
cond[:resource_id] = resource.id if resource && !resource.is_a?(Class)
roles = relation.roles.where(cond)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_cached
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_cached(relation, args)
resource_id = (args[:resource].nil? || args[:resource].is_a?(Class) || args[:resource] == :any) ? nil : args[:resource].id
resource_type = args[:resource].is_a?(Class) ? args[:resource].to_s : args[:resource].class.name
return relation.find_all { |role| role.name == args[:name].to_s } if args[:resource] == :any
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_cached
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_cached(relation, args)
resource_id = (args[:resource].nil? || args[:resource].is_a?(Class) || args[:resource] == :any) ? nil : args[:resource].id
resource_type = args[:resource].is_a?(Class) ? args[:resource].to_s : args[:resource].class.name
return relation.find_all { |role| role.name == args[:name].to_s } if args[:resource] == :any
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has_all_roles?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_all_roles?(*args)
args.each do |arg|
if arg.is_a? Hash
return false if !self.has_role?(arg[:name], arg[:resource])
elsif arg.is_a?(String) || arg.is_a?(Symbol)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove(relation, role_name, resource = nil)
#roles = { :name => role_name }
#roles.merge!({:resource_type => (resource.is_a?(Class) ? resource.to_s : resource.class.name)}) if resource
#roles.merge!({ :resource_id => resource.id }) if resource && !resource.is_a?(Class)
#roles_to_remove = relation.roles.where(roles)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_role
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_role(role_name, resource = nil)
role = self.class.adapter.find_or_create_by(role_name.to_s,
(resource.is_a?(Class) ? resource.to_s : resource.class.name if resource),
(resource.id if resource && !resource.is_a?(Class)))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method respond_to?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_to?(method, include_private = false)
if Rolify.dynamic_shortcuts && (method.to_s.match(/^is_(\w+)_of[?]$/) || method.to_s.match(/^is_(\w+)[?]$/))
query = self.class.role_class.where(:name => $1)
query = self.class.adapter.exists?(query, :resource_type) if method.to_s.match(/^is_(\w+)_of[?]$/)
return true if query.count > 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has_role?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_role?(role_name, resource = nil)
return has_strict_role?(role_name, resource) if self.class.strict_rolify and resource and resource != :any
if new_record?
role_array = self.roles.detect { |r|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sanity_check
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sanity_check(role_cnames)
return true if ARGV.reduce(nil) { |acc,arg| arg =~ /assets:/ if acc.nil? } == 0
role_cnames.each do |role_cname|
role_class = role_cname.constantize
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_query(role, resource = nil)
return [{ :name => role }] if resource == :any
query = [{ :name => role, :resource_type => nil, :resource_id => nil }]
if resource
query << { :name => role, :resource_type => (resource.is_a?(Class) ? resource.to_s : resource.class.name), :resource_id => nil }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_query(role, resource = nil)
return [ "#{role_table}.name = ?", [ role ] ] if resource == :any
query = "((#{role_table}.name = ?) AND (#{role_table}.resource_type IS NULL) AND (#{role_table}.resource_id IS NULL))"
values = [ role ]
if resource
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_cached_strict
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_cached_strict(relation, args)
resource_id = (args[:resource].nil? || args[:resource].is_a?(Class)) ? nil : args[:resource].id
resource_type = args[:resource].is_a?(Class) ? args[:resource].to_s : args[:resource].class.name
relation.find_all do |role|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_cached_strict
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_cached_strict(relation, args)
resource_id = (args[:resource].nil? || args[:resource].is_a?(Class)) ? nil : args[:resource].id
resource_type = args[:resource].is_a?(Class) ? args[:resource].to_s : args[:resource].class.name
relation.find_all do |role|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_dynamic_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_dynamic_method(role_name, resource)
class_eval do
define_method("is_#{role_name}?".to_sym) do
has_role?("#{role_name}")
end if !method_defined?("is_#{role_name}?".to_sym) && self.adapter.where_strict(self.role_class, name: role_name).exists?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"