Showing 11 of 42 total issues
Query
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
type Query struct {
repo *Repo
Collection string
Fields []string
AggregateField string
Method Form.convert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (form Form) convert(str string, typ reflect.Type) (interface{}, bool) {
result := interface{}(nil)
valid := false
switch typ.Kind() {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Builder
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
type Builder struct {
config *Config
returnField string
count int
}
Method Form.convert
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (form Form) convert(str string, typ reflect.Type) (interface{}, bool) {
result := interface{}(nil)
valid := false
switch typ.Kind() {
Method JSON.convert
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (json *JSON) convert(value gjson.Result, typ reflect.Type) (interface{}, bool) {
if value.Type == gjson.Null {
return nil, true
}
Function ParseForm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func ParseForm(raw url.Values) Form {
result := make(Form, len(raw))
for k, v := range raw {
if len(v) == 0 {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Not
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func Not(inner ...Condition) Condition {
if len(inner) == 1 {
c := inner[0]
switch c.Type {
case ConditionEq:
Method JSON.convert
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func (json *JSON) convert(value gjson.Result, typ reflect.Type) (interface{}, bool) {
if value.Type == gjson.Null {
return nil, true
}
Method Map.GetWithType
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func (m Map) GetWithType(name string, typ reflect.Type) (interface{}, bool) {
value := m[name]
if value == nil {
return nil, true
Function ValidateRange
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func ValidateRange(ch *Changeset, field string, min int, max int, opts ...Option) {
Method Query.Save
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func (query Query) Save(record interface{}) error {
rv := reflect.ValueOf(record)
rt := rv.Type()
if rt.Kind() == reflect.Ptr && rt.Elem().Kind() == reflect.Slice {
// Put multiple records