HazyResearch/fonduer

View on GitHub
src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_neighbor_sentence_ngrams. (6)
Open

def get_neighbor_sentence_ngrams(
    mention: Union[Candidate, Mention, TemporarySpanMention],
    d: int = 1,
    attrib: str = "words",
    n_min: int = 1,

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_between_ngrams. (6)
Open

def get_between_ngrams(
    c: Candidate,
    attrib: str = "words",
    n_min: int = 1,
    n_max: int = 1,

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function get_between_ngrams has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_between_ngrams(
    c: Candidate,
    attrib: str = "words",
    n_min: int = 1,
    n_max: int = 1,
Severity: Minor
Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_neighbor_sentence_ngrams has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_neighbor_sentence_ngrams(
Severity: Minor
Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Function get_right_ngrams has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def get_right_ngrams(
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Function get_left_ngrams has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def get_left_ngrams(
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Function get_sentence_ngrams has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def get_sentence_ngrams(
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Function get_between_ngrams has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def get_between_ngrams(
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/fonduer/utils/data_model_utils/textual.py - About 35 mins to fix

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status