Showing 397 of 397 total issues
File core.py
has 3761 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
""" Classes to represent modified forms of DNA, RNA, and proteins
:Author: Jonathan Karr <karr@mssm.edu>
:Date: 2019-01-31
:Copyright: 2019, Karr Lab
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=f, mode='rb') as gz:
line = gz.readline().decode('utf-8').strip()
while line != '':
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 405.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with gzip.open(f, 'rb') as gz:
line = gz.readline().decode('utf-8').strip()
while line != '':
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 405.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if monomer is None:
# add the entry to the alphabet
alphabet.monomers[pdb_monomer.id] = pdb_monomer
if base_monomer is not None:
base_monomers[pdb_monomer] = base_monomer
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 386.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if monomer is None:
# add the entry to the alphabet
alphabet.monomers[pdb_monomer.id] = pdb_monomer
if base_monomer is not None:
base_monomers[pdb_monomer] = base_monomer
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 386.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function gen_bpform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 163 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gen_bpform(protein, pro_ids_to_bpform_monomers, monomer_codes,
apply_processing=True, apply_modifications=True, include_annotations=True):
""" Generate BpForm for a modified protein in PRO
Args:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function build_rna_mod_db
has a Cognitive Complexity of 116 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_rna_mod_db(self, alphabet, session, ph=None, major_tautomer=False, dearomatize=False):
""" Build alphabet from the RNA Modification Database
Args:
alphabet (:obj:`Alphabet`): alphabet
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function build_pdb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 114 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_pdb(self, alphabet, session, ph=None, major_tautomer=False, dearomatize=False):
""" Build monomeric forms from PDB CCD
Args:
alphabet (:obj:`Alphabet`): alphabet
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function build_pdb_ccd
has a Cognitive Complexity of 113 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_pdb_ccd(self, alphabet, ph=None, major_tautomer=False, dearomatize=False):
""" Build monomeric forms from PDB CCD
Args:
alphabet (:obj:`Alphabet`): alphabet
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 113 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(self):
""" Check that the biopolymer form is valid and return any errors
* Check that monomeric forms :math:`1 \ldots L-1` can bond to the right (their right bonding attributes are set)
* Check that monomeric forms :math:`2 \ldots L` can bond to the left (their left bonding attributes are set)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File rna.py
has 912 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
""" Alphabet and BpForm to represent modified RNA
:Author: Jonathan Karr <karr@mssm.edu>
:Date: 2019-02-05
:Copyright: 2019, Karr Lab
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for x_link in sorted_x_links:
if prev_vert and x_link['l_polymer_col'] == x_link['r_polymer_col'] and \
x_link['l_pos'] == x_link['r_pos'] and \
x_link['l_polymer_col'] == prev_col and \
x_link['l_pos'] == prev_pos and \
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 239.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for x_link in sorted_x_links:
if prev_horz and x_link['l_polymer_row'] == x_link['r_polymer_row'] and \
x_link['l_track'] == x_link['r_track'] and \
x_link['l_polymer_row'] == prev_row and \
x_link['l_track'] == prev_track and \
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 239.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function from_str
has a Cognitive Complexity of 102 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def from_str(self, string):
""" Create biopolymer form its string representation
Args:
string (:obj:`str`): string representation of the biopolymer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function load_pdb_from_local
has a Cognitive Complexity of 98 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_pdb_from_local(max_entries):
""" read the PDB database and parse the entries from local directory
"""
# get amino acid set (canonical and non-canonical) from bpforms
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 97 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(in_obo_filename=IN_OBO_FILENAME, in_pkl_filename=IN_PKL_FILENAME, in_tsv_filename=IN_TSV_FILELANE,
in_monomers_filename=IN_MONOMERS_FILENAME,
max_num_proteins=None,
out_pickle_filename=OUT_PICKLE_FILENAME, out_pickle_filename_2=OUT_PICKLE_FILENAME_2,
out_tsv_filename=OUT_TSV_FILENAME, out_fasta_filename=OUT_FASTA_FILENAME,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function build_from_pdb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 96 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_from_pdb(self, alphabet, ph=None, major_tautomer=False, dearomatize=False):
""" Build alphabet from `PDB Chemical Component Dictionary <http://www.wwpdb.org/data/ccd>`_
Args:
alphabet (:obj:`Alphabet`): alphabet
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function gen_genomic_viz
has a Cognitive Complexity of 96 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gen_genomic_viz(polymers, inter_crosslinks=None, polymer_labels=None, seq_features=None,
width=800, cols=1, polymer_margin=25,
nt_per_track=100, track_sep=10,
polymer_label_font_size=15, seq_font_size=13, tick_label_font_size=10,
legend_font_size=13, tooltip_font_size=13,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File util.py
has 778 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
""" Utilities for BpForms
:Author: Jonathan Karr <karr@mssm.edu>
:Date: 2019-02-05
:Copyright: 2019, Karr Lab
File protein.py
has 765 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
""" Alphabet and BpForm to represent modified proteins
:Author: Jonathan Karr <karr@mssm.edu>
:Date: 2019-02-05
:Copyright: 2019, Karr Lab