Sign upLogin

KissPeter/APIFuzzer

View on GitHub
Star
apifuzzer/utils.py

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage
C
75%

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function transform_data_to_bytes. (6)
Open

def transform_data_to_bytes(data_in):
    """
    Transform data to bytes
    :param data_in: data to transform
    :type data_in: str, float, Bits
Severity: Minor
Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function json_data. (6)
Open

def json_data(arg_string: Optional[str]) -> dict:
    """
    Transforms input string to JSON. Input must be dict or list of dicts like string
    :type arg_string: str
    :rtype dict
Severity: Minor
Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function transform_data_to_bytes has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def transform_data_to_bytes(data_in):
    """
    Transform data to bytes
    :param data_in: data to transform
    :type data_in: str, float, Bits
Severity: Minor
Found in apifuzzer/utils.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function set_logger has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def set_logger(level="warning", basic_output=False):
    """
    Setup logger
    :param level: log level
    :type level: log level
Severity: Minor
Found in apifuzzer/utils.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

        return bytes(data_in)
Severity: Major
Found in apifuzzer/utils.py - About 30 mins to fix

    Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "51" or change one of the implementations.
    Open

                handler = logging.StreamHandler(stream=sys.stdout)
    Severity: Major
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by sonar-python

    Having two branches in the same if structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4

    Compliant Solution

    if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4

    or 

    if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_third_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4

    Line too long (87 > 79 characters)
    Open

        :param basic_output: If set to True, application logs to the terminal not to Syslog
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    Line too long (84 > 79 characters)
    Open

        Transforms input string to JSON. Input must be dict or list of dicts like string
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    Line too long (87 > 79 characters)
    Open

        if isinstance(arg_string, dict) or isinstance(arg_string, list):  # support testing
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    Line too long (120 > 79 characters)
    Open

        Provides solution for B311 "Standard pseudo-random generators are not suitable for security/cryptographic purposes."
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    Line too long (110 > 79 characters)
    Open

            fmt = "%(process)d [%(levelname)7s] %(name)s [%(filename)s:%(lineno)s - %(funcName)20s ]: %(message)s"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apifuzzer/utils.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status