Konstantin8105/f4go

View on GitHub

Showing 79 of 79 total issues

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                    if ok {
                        // add init
                        var inject []node
                        inject = append(inject, typ...)
                        for i := start; i < pos; i++ {
Severity: Major
Found in fortran/parser.go - About 45 mins to fix

    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
    Open

                            if strings.Contains(arg.Name, "func()*[]byte{y:=[]byte(") {
                                arg.Name = arg.Name[17:]
                                index := strings.LastIndex(arg.Name, "\")")
                                arg.Name = arg.Name[:index+2]
                                if i > 1 {
    Severity: Major
    Found in fortran/function_definition.go - About 45 mins to fix

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                          switch p.ns[pos].tok {
                          case token.LPAREN:
                              counter++
                          case token.RPAREN:
                              counter--
      Severity: Major
      Found in fortran/parser.go - About 45 mins to fix

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                                if len(arg.Name) > 10 && arg.Name[:7] == "func()*" {
                                    arg.Name = "*" + arg.Name
                                    continue
                                }
        Severity: Major
        Found in fortran/function_definition.go - About 45 mins to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  print("--> ALL PRECISIONS\t"+str(list_results[0][4])+"\t\t"+str(list_results[1][4])+"\t("+"%.3f" % percent_num_error+"%)\t"+str(list_results[2][4]+list_results[3][4])+"\t("+"%.3f" % percent_error+"%)\t""\n")
          Severity: Major
          Found in testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
          testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py on lines 311..311
          testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py on lines 316..316

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 35.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  percent_error=float(list_results[2][4]+list_results[3][4])/float(list_results[0][4])*100
          Severity: Major
          Found in testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
          testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py on lines 311..311
          testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py on lines 321..321

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 35.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                              if len(f.b) > 1 {
                                  s += "%" + string(f.b[1:]) + "s"
                              } else {
                                  s += "%s"
                              }
          Severity: Major
          Found in fortran/io.go - About 45 mins to fix

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                                    if par, ok := un.X.(*goast.ParenExpr); ok {
                                        if id, ok := par.X.(*goast.IndexExpr); ok {
                                            call.Args[i] = id
                                            continue
                                        }
            Severity: Major
            Found in fortran/function_definition.go - About 45 mins to fix

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                                  if !isDigit(e.Value.(*node).b[en]) {
                                      break
                                  }
              Severity: Major
              Found in fortran/scan.go - About 45 mins to fix

                Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                Open

                                    if i+1 < len(fs) && fs[i+1].tok == token.INT {
                                        s += string(fs[i+1].b)
                                        i += 1
                                    }
                Severity: Major
                Found in fortran/io.go - About 45 mins to fix

                  Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                  Open

                                      if rightSeparator+1 < len(rightPart) &&
                                          rightPart[rightSeparator+1].tok == token.LPAREN {
                                          rightSeparator++
                                          counter := 0
                                          for {
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in fortran/util.go - About 45 mins to fix

                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                    Open

                                        if counter == 0 {
                                            break
                                        }
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in fortran/parser.go - About 45 mins to fix

                      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                      Open

                                              if len(arg.Name) > 3 && arg.Name[:2] == "&(" {
                                                  arg.Name = arg.Name[2 : len(arg.Name)-1]
                                                  continue
                                              }
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in fortran/function_definition.go - About 45 mins to fix

                        Method scanner.scanTokensAfter has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                        func (s *scanner) scanTokensAfter() {
                            entities := []struct {
                                tok     token.Token
                                pattern []string
                            }{
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in fortran/scan.go - About 45 mins to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            summary+=name+"\t"+str(list_results[0][dtype])+"\t\t"+str(list_results[1][dtype])+"\t("+"%.3f" % percent_num_error+"%)\t"+str(list_results[2][dtype]+list_results[3][dtype])+"\t("+"%.3f" % percent_error+"%)\t""\n"
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                        testdata/lapack/lapack_testing.py on lines 300..300

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 35.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Method parser.parseStmt has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
                        Open

                        func (p *parser) parseStmt() (stmts []goast.Stmt) {
                            onlyForRecover := p.ident
                        
                            pos := p.ns[p.ident].pos
                        
                        
                        Severity: Major
                        Found in fortran/parser.go - About 40 mins to fix

                          Method parser.isComplex has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
                          Open

                          func (p *parser) isComplex(e goast.Expr) (isComplex, ok bool) {
                              if par, ok := e.(*goast.ParenExpr); ok {
                                  if st, ok := par.X.(*goast.StarExpr); ok {
                                      if id, ok := st.X.(*goast.Ident); ok {
                                          if v, ok := p.initVars.get(id.Name); ok {
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in fortran/expression.go - About 35 mins to fix

                            Method goType.getMinLimit has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
                            Open

                            func (g goType) getMinLimit(col int) (size int, ok bool) {
                                if !g.isArray() {
                                    return
                                }
                                if col > len(g.arrayNode) {
                            Severity: Major
                            Found in fortran/type.go - About 35 mins to fix

                              Method strChanger.Visit has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                              func (s strChanger) Visit(node goast.Node) (w goast.Visitor) {
                                  if call, ok := node.(*goast.CallExpr); ok {
                                      if sel, ok := call.Fun.(*goast.SelectorExpr); ok {
                                          if id, ok := sel.X.(*goast.Ident); ok {
                                              if id.Name == "fmt" || id.Name == "math" {
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in fortran/parser.go - About 35 mins to fix

                              Cognitive Complexity

                              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                              Further reading

                              Severity
                              Category
                              Status
                              Source
                              Language