Showing 51 of 51 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Matchers
module Validations
def validate_presence_of(*attributes)
ValidatePresenceOfMatcher.new(attributes)
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Matchers
module Validations
def validate_absence_of(*attributes)
ValidateAbsenceOfMatcher.new(attributes)
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Block has too many lines. [54/25] Open
describe Easy::Matchers::BaseValidationMatcher do
let(:attributes) { :attribute }
let(:type) { :validator }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [19.62/15] Open
def matches?(actual)
@klass = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect{ |v|
v.kind == @type && (!v.options[:on] || on_options_matches?(v))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def matches?(actual)
@klass = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect{ |v|
v.kind == @type && (!v.options[:on] || on_options_matches?(v))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [17.29/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
add_allow_nil_and_accept_to_options
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
matched_validator = class_name.validators.detect do |validator|
validator.kind == type &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
matched_validator = class_name.validators.detect do |validator|
validator.kind == type &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
matched_validator = class_name.validators.detect do |validator|
validator.kind == type &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
matched_validator = class_name.validators.detect do |validator|
validator.kind == type &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for matches? is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def matches?(subject)
super(subject)
matched_validator = class_name.validators.detect do |validator|
validator.kind == type &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
@klass = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect{ |v|
v.kind == @type && (!v.options[:on] || on_options_matches?(v))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Add an empty line after magic comments. Open
lib = File.expand_path('../lib', __FILE__)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for a newline after the final magic comment.
Example:
# good
# frozen_string_literal: true
# Some documentation for Person
class Person
# Some code
end
# bad
# frozen_string_literal: true
# Some documentation for Person
class Person
# Some code
end
Useless private
access modifier. Open
private
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant access modifiers, including those with no
code, those which are repeated, and leading public
modifiers in a
class or module body. Conditionally-defined methods are considered as
always being defined, and thus access modifiers guarding such methods
are not redundant.
Example:
class Foo
public # this is redundant (default access is public)
def method
end
private # this is not redundant (a method is defined)
def method2
end
private # this is redundant (no following methods are defined)
end
Example:
class Foo
# The following is not redundant (conditionally defined methods are
# considered as always defining a method)
private
if condition?
def method
end
end
protected # this is not redundant (method is defined)
define_method(:method2) do
end
protected # this is redundant (repeated from previous modifier)
[1,2,3].each do |i|
define_method("foo#{i}") do
end
end
# The following is redundant (methods defined on the class'
# singleton class are not affected by the public modifier)
public
def self.method3
end
end
Example:
# Lint/UselessAccessModifier:
# ContextCreatingMethods:
# - concerning
require 'active_support/concern'
class Foo
concerning :Bar do
def some_public_method
end
private
def some_private_method
end
end
# this is not redundant because `concerning` created its own context
private
def some_other_private_method
end
end
Example:
# Lint/UselessAccessModifier:
# MethodCreatingMethods:
# - delegate
require 'active_support/core_ext/module/delegation'
class Foo
# this is not redundant because `delegate` creates methods
private
delegate :method_a, to: :method_b
end
Space missing to the left of {. Open
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect{ |v|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that block braces have or don't have a space before the opening brace depending on configuration.
Example:
# bad
foo.map{ |a|
a.bar.to_s
}
# good
foo.map { |a|
a.bar.to_s
}
Avoid using {...}
for multi-line blocks. Open
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect{ |v|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Check for uses of braces or do/end around single line or multi-line blocks.
Example: EnforcedStyle: linecountbased (default)
# bad - single line block
items.each do |item| item / 5 end
# good - single line block
items.each { |item| item / 5 }
# bad - multi-line block
things.map { |thing|
something = thing.some_method
process(something)
}
# good - multi-line block
things.map do |thing|
something = thing.some_method
process(something)
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: semantic
# Prefer `do...end` over `{...}` for procedural blocks.
# return value is used/assigned
# bad
foo = map do |x|
x
end
puts (map do |x|
x
end)
# return value is not used out of scope
# good
map do |x|
x
end
# Prefer `{...}` over `do...end` for functional blocks.
# return value is not used out of scope
# bad
each { |x|
x
}
# return value is used/assigned
# good
foo = map { |x|
x
}
map { |x|
x
}.inspect
Example: EnforcedStyle: bracesforchaining
# bad
words.each do |word|
word.flip.flop
end.join("-")
# good
words.each { |word|
word.flip.flop
}.join("-")
Unused method argument - symbol_name
. If it's necessary, use _
or _symbol_name
as an argument name to indicate that it won't be used. You can also write as with_if(*)
if you want the method to accept any arguments but don't care about them. Open
def with_if(symbol_name)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused method arguments.
Example:
# bad
def some_method(used, unused, _unused_but_allowed)
puts used
end
Example:
# good
def some_method(used, _unused, _unused_but_allowed)
puts used
end
Incorrect indentation detected (column 8 instead of 10). Open
# super << " #{ options_desc.to_sentence }"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks the indentation of comments.
Example:
# bad
# comment here
def method_name
end
# comment here
a = 'hello'
# yet another comment
if true
true
end
# good
# comment here
def method_name
end
# comment here
a = 'hello'
# yet another comment
if true
true
end
Expression at 49, 95 should be on its own line. Open
.to raise_error(NotImplementedError, 'Subclasses must implement a description method.') }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end statement of a do..end block is on its own line.
Example:
# bad
blah do |i|
foo(i) end
# good
blah do |i|
foo(i)
end
# bad
blah { |i|
foo(i) }
# good
blah { |i|
foo(i)
}
Avoid using {...}
for multi-line blocks. Open
specify { expect { subject.on(:create) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Check for uses of braces or do/end around single line or multi-line blocks.
Example: EnforcedStyle: linecountbased (default)
# bad - single line block
items.each do |item| item / 5 end
# good - single line block
items.each { |item| item / 5 }
# bad - multi-line block
things.map { |thing|
something = thing.some_method
process(something)
}
# good - multi-line block
things.map do |thing|
something = thing.some_method
process(something)
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: semantic
# Prefer `do...end` over `{...}` for procedural blocks.
# return value is used/assigned
# bad
foo = map do |x|
x
end
puts (map do |x|
x
end)
# return value is not used out of scope
# good
map do |x|
x
end
# Prefer `{...}` over `do...end` for functional blocks.
# return value is not used out of scope
# bad
each { |x|
x
}
# return value is used/assigned
# good
foo = map { |x|
x
}
map { |x|
x
}.inspect
Example: EnforcedStyle: bracesforchaining
# bad
words.each do |word|
word.flip.flop
end.join("-")
# good
words.each { |word|
word.flip.flop
}.join("-")