Method ask_question_loop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ask_question_loop
loop do
return false unless ask_questions
return true if activate
return false unless agree("Try again? (Y/N) ")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method activate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def activate
if !key_exist? || force
if get_new_key
save_new_key
else
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Remove unnecessary existence check File.exist?
. Open
FileUtils.rm(NEW_KEY_FILE) if File.exist?(NEW_KEY_FILE)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for non-atomic file operation. And then replace it with a nearly equivalent and atomic method.
These can cause problems that are difficult to reproduce, especially in cases of frequent file operations in parallel, such as test runs with parallel_rspec.
For examples: creating a directory if there is none, has the following problems
An exception occurs when the directory didn't exist at the time of exist?
,
but someone else created it before mkdir
was executed.
Subsequent processes are executed without the directory that should be there
when the directory existed at the time of exist?
,
but someone else deleted it shortly afterwards.
Safety:
This cop is unsafe, because autocorrection change to atomic processing. The atomic processing of the replacement destination is not guaranteed to be strictly equivalent to that before the replacement.
Example:
# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `mkdir`
unless Dir.exist?(path)
FileUtils.mkdir(path)
end
# good - atomic and idempotent creation
FileUtils.mkdir_p(path)
# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `remove`
if File.exist?(path)
FileUtils.remove(path)
end
# good - atomic and idempotent removal
FileUtils.rm_f(path)
Use atomic file operation method FileUtils.rm_f
. Open
FileUtils.rm(NEW_KEY_FILE) if File.exist?(NEW_KEY_FILE)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for non-atomic file operation. And then replace it with a nearly equivalent and atomic method.
These can cause problems that are difficult to reproduce, especially in cases of frequent file operations in parallel, such as test runs with parallel_rspec.
For examples: creating a directory if there is none, has the following problems
An exception occurs when the directory didn't exist at the time of exist?
,
but someone else created it before mkdir
was executed.
Subsequent processes are executed without the directory that should be there
when the directory existed at the time of exist?
,
but someone else deleted it shortly afterwards.
Safety:
This cop is unsafe, because autocorrection change to atomic processing. The atomic processing of the replacement destination is not guaranteed to be strictly equivalent to that before the replacement.
Example:
# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `mkdir`
unless Dir.exist?(path)
FileUtils.mkdir(path)
end
# good - atomic and idempotent creation
FileUtils.mkdir_p(path)
# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `remove`
if File.exist?(path)
FileUtils.remove(path)
end
# good - atomic and idempotent removal
FileUtils.rm_f(path)