Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star
app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 60 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate(values)
    # => Input - A hash keyed by field name with entered values
    # => Output - true || false
    #
    # Update @dialogs adding error keys to fields that don't validate
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method init_from_dialog has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def init_from_dialog(init_values)
    @dialogs[:dialogs].keys.each do |dialog_name|
      get_all_fields(dialog_name).each_pair do |field_name, field_values|
        next unless init_values[field_name].nil?
        next if field_values[:display] == :ignore
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method allowed_tags has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allowed_tags(options = {})
    return @tags unless @tags.nil?

    region_number = options.delete(:region_number)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity for allowed_tags is too high. [16/11]
Open

  def allowed_tags(options = {})
    return @tags unless @tags.nil?

    region_number = options.delete(:region_number)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for validate is too high. [15/11]
Open

  def validate(values)
    # => Input - A hash keyed by field name with entered values
    # => Output - true || false
    #
    # Update @dialogs adding error keys to fields that don't validate
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method get_field has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def get_field(field_name, dialog_name = nil, refresh_values = true)
    field_name = field_name.to_sym
    dialog_name = find_dialog_from_field_name(field_name) if dialog_name.nil?
    field = @dialogs.fetch_path(:dialogs, dialog_name.to_sym, :fields, field_name)
    return {} unless field
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method dialog_name_from_automate has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def dialog_name_from_automate(message = 'get_dialog_name', input_fields = [:request_type], extra_attrs = {})
    return nil if self.class.automate_dialog_request.nil?

    _log.info("Querying Automate Profile for dialog name")
    attrs = {'request' => self.class.automate_dialog_request, 'message' => message}
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method get_ems_folders has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def get_ems_folders(folder, dh = {}, full_path = "")
    path = full_path
    if folder.evm_object_class == :EmsFolder
      if folder.hidden
        return dh if folder.name != 'vm'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_or_default_field_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_or_default_field_values(values)
    field_names = values.keys
    fields do |fn, f, _dn, _d|
      if field_names.include?(fn)
        if f.key?(:values)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_ws_field_value_by_display_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_ws_field_value_by_display_name(values, key, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields, obj_key = :name)
    value = data.delete(key)

    dlg_field = dlg_fields[key]
    data_type = dlg_field[:data_type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method allowed_customization_templates has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allowed_customization_templates(_options = {})
    result = []
    customization_template_id = get_value(@values[:customization_template_id])
    @values[:customization_template_script] = nil if customization_template_id.nil?
    prov_typ = "vm"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_data_types has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_data_types(value, fld, msg, valid)
    case fld[:data_type]
    when :integer
      unless is_integer?(value)
        fld[:error] = msg
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_value_from_list has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_value_from_list(fn, f, value, values = nil, partial_key = false)
    @values[fn] = [nil, nil]
    values = f[:values] if values.nil?
    unless value.nil?
      @values[fn] = values.to_a.detect do |v|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_ws_field_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_ws_field_value(values, key, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields)
    value = data.delete(key)

    dlg_field = dlg_fields[key]
    data_type = dlg_field[:data_type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [7/5]
Open

  def set_ws_field_value_by_id_or_name(values, dlg_field, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields, data_key = nil, id_klass = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for methods with too many parameters. The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count.

Method parse_ws_string has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.parse_ws_string(text_input, options = {})
    return parse_request_parameter_hash(text_input, options) if text_input.kind_of?(Hash)
    return {} unless text_input.kind_of?(String)

    deprecated_warn = "method: parse_ws_string, arg Type => String"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [6/5]
Open

  def set_ws_field_value_by_display_name(values, key, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields, obj_key = :name)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for methods with too many parameters. The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

              if value.blank?
                fld[:error] = "#{required_description(dlg, fld)} is required"
                valid = false
                next
              end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

                   [set_value, field_values[set_value]] if field_values.key?(set_value)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

              unless fld[:error].nil?
                valid = false
                next
              end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

          unless field[:auto_select_single] == false
            @values[field_name] = field[:values].to_a.first
          end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

          unless currently_selected.nil? || field[:values].key?(currently_selected)
            @values[field_name] = [nil, nil]
          end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

                   [found.id, found.send(obj_key)] if found
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

            unless f[:values].blank?
              sorted_values = f[:values].sort
              selected_key = sorted_values.first.first
            end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting.
Open

                   [found.id, found.name] if found
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.

You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks option. When set to false (the default) blocks are not counted towards the nesting level. Set to true to count blocks as well.

The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

        value = fld[:data_type] =~ /array_/ ? values[f] : get_value(values[f])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

      tag[:children] = if tag[:children].first.last[:name] =~ /^\d/
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allowed_respools(_options = {})
    all_resource_pools = ResourcePool.where(:ems_id => get_source_and_targets[:ems].try(:id))
    filtered_targets   = process_filter(:rp_filter, ResourcePool, all_resource_pools)
    allowed_ci(:respool, [:cluster, :host, :folder], filtered_targets.collect(&:id))
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb on lines 1111..1114

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allowed_clusters(_options = {})
    all_clusters     = EmsCluster.where(:ems_id => get_source_and_targets[:ems].try(:id))
    filtered_targets = process_filter(:cluster_filter, EmsCluster, all_clusters)
    allowed_ci(:cluster, [:respool, :host, :folder], filtered_targets.collect(&:id))
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb on lines 1117..1120

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid when branches without a body.
Open

    when :boolean
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for the presence of when branches without a body.

Example:

# bad

case foo
when bar then 1
when baz then # nothing
end

Example:

# good

case foo
when bar then 1
when baz then 2
end

Avoid when branches without a body.
Open

    when :button
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for the presence of when branches without a body.

Example:

# bad

case foo
when bar then 1
when baz then # nothing
end

Example:

# good

case foo
when bar then 1
when baz then 2
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status