Showing 1,132 of 1,132 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const recordValid = new MarcRecord({
leader: 'foo',
fields: [
{
tag: '245',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const recordInvalid655EngNoNoControl = new MarcRecord({
leader: '',
fields: [
{
tag: '655',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function fieldIsBluray300(field) {
if (field.tag !== '300') {
return false;
}
return field.subfields.some(subfield => subfield.value.match(/(?:Blu.?ray|BD)/ui));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const recordValid = new MarcRecord({
leader: 'foo',
fields: [
{
tag: '245',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const recordInvalidFixed = new MarcRecord({
leader: 'foo',
fields: [
{
tag: '245',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const recordValid655EngYesNoControl = new MarcRecord({
leader: '',
fields: [
{
tag: '655',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function fieldIsDvd300(field) {
if (field.tag !== '300') {
return false;
}
return field.subfields.some(subfield => subfield.value.match(/DVD/ui));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function sortByOccurrenceNumber
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sortByOccurrenceNumber(fieldA, fieldB) { // Sort by subfield $6
function fieldGetOccurrenceNumber(field) { // should this function be exported? (based on validator sortRelatorFields.js)
if (!field.subfields) {
return 0;
Function guessMissing337B
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function guessMissing337B(record) {
const typeOfRecord = record.getTypeOfRecord();
if (typeOfRecord === 'm') { // LDR/06=m/computer file
return 'c'; // computer
Function keepOrDropPreventsMerge
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function keepOrDropPreventsMerge() {
const keepOrDrop1 = baseFieldSubfields9.filter(sf => subfieldHasKeepOrDrop(sf));
const keepOrDrop2 = sourceFieldSubfields9.filter(sf => subfieldHasKeepOrDrop(sf));
if (keepOrDrop1.length === 0 && keepOrDrop2.length === 0) {
Function mergeOrAddSubfieldNotRequired
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mergeOrAddSubfieldNotRequired(targetField, candSubfieldData) {
if (catalogingSourceModifyingAgencyCandIsOriginalCatalogingSourceAgencyInTargetField(targetField, candSubfieldData) || ennakkotietoInSubfieldG(candSubfieldData)) {
return true;
}
Function getRelevant5XXFields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function getRelevant5XXFields(record, f500 = false, f594 = false) {
const cands = actualGetFields();
//nvdebugFieldArray(cands, 'gR5XXa: ', debugDev);
const filtered = cands.filter(field => hasRelevantPrepubData(field));
//nvdebugFieldArray(filtered, 'gR5XXb: ', debugDev);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mergeOrAddSubfield
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function mergeOrAddSubfield(targetField, candSubfieldData, candFieldPairs880 = []) {
const candSubfieldAsString = `${candSubfieldData.code} ${candSubfieldData.originalValue}`;
nvdebug(` Q: mergeOrAddSubfield '${candSubfieldAsString}'\n with field '${fieldToString(targetField)}'?`, debugDev);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function subfieldHandleRelatorTermAbbreviation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function subfieldHandleRelatorTermAbbreviation(subfield, language) {
if (subfield.code !== 'e') {
return;
}
nvdebug(`Relator cand subfield: '${subfieldToString(subfield)}', lang: ${language ? language : 'NULL'}`, debugDev);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function swapSubfields
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function swapSubfields(field, sortOrder) {
if (!field.subfields) {
return;
}
Function default
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function () {
return {
description: 'Validates 008 06',
validate,
fix
Function projectedToField338
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function projectedToField338(record) {
const typeOfRecord = record.getTypeOfRecord(record);
if (typeOfRecord !== 'g') { // must be "projected"
return undefined;
}
Function sortByRelatorTerm
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sortByRelatorTerm(fieldA, fieldB) {
//if (!['600', '610', '611', '630', '700', '710', '711', '730', '800', '810', '811', '830'].includes(fieldA.tag)) {
if (!['700', '710', '711', '730'].includes(fieldA.tag)) {
return 0;
}
Function fixField
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fixField(field, catalogingLanguage = 'fin') {
const subfieldA = getA(field);
if (!subfieldA) {
return;
}
Function isSubfield6Pair
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function isSubfield6Pair(field, otherField) {
// No need to log this:
//nvdebug(`LOOK for $6-pair:\n ${fieldToString(field)}\n ${fieldToString(otherField)}`);
if (!fieldHasValidSubfield6(field) || !fieldHasValidSubfield6(otherField)) {
return false;