Showing 464 of 464 total issues
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if "keys" in kwargs and "values" in kwargs:
key_condition = isinstance(kwargs["keys"], list) or isinstance(
kwargs["keys"], tuple
)
val_condition = isinstance(kwargs["values"], list) or isinstance(Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if "keys" in kwargs and "values" in kwargs:
key_condition = isinstance(kwargs["keys"], list) or isinstance(
kwargs["keys"], tuple
)
val_condition = isinstance(kwargs["values"], list) or isinstance(Function bqm_from_numpy_matrix has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bqm_from_numpy_matrix(Function se_upper_tts has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def se_upper_tts(tts, success_prob, computation_time, p_r, se_success_prob):Function _annealing_schedule_setting has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _annealing_schedule_setting(Function se_lower_tts has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def se_lower_tts(tts, success_prob, computation_time, p_r, se_success_prob):Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(Function make_BinaryPolynomialModel_from_JSON has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_BinaryPolynomialModel_from_JSON(obj):
if obj["type"] != "BinaryPolynomialModel":
raise Exception('Type must be "BinaryPolynomialModel"')
mock_polynomial = {}
if obj["index_type"] == "IndexType.INT":- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if "anneal_time_per_run" in response.info:
o_res.info["execution_time"] = response.info["anneal_time_per_run"]- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if "qpu_sampling_time" in response.info:
o_res.info["sampling_time"] = response.info["qpu_sampling_time"]- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return _BinaryPolynomialModel_from_list(Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return _BinaryPolynomialModel_from_dict(Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return _BinaryPolynomialModel_from_list(Function geometric_ising_beta_schedule has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def geometric_ising_beta_schedule(
cxxgraph: Union[openjij.cxxjij.graph.Dense, openjij.cxxjij.graph.CSRSparse],
beta_max=None,
beta_min=None,
num_sweeps=1000,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rename_kwargs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rename_kwargs(func_name, kwargs, aliases):
for alias, new in aliases.items():
if alias in kwargs:
if new in kwargs:
raise TypeError(f"{func_name} received both {alias} and {new}")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _set_params has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _set_params(self, **kwargs):
for key, value in kwargs.items():
if key not in self._default_params:
raise ValueError("Unknown parameters detected")
if value is None:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sample_hubo has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sample_hubo(
self,
J: dict[tuple, float],
vartype: Optional[str] = None,
num_sweeps: int = 1000,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Line length Open
| **Sunburst** | **Grid** | **Icicle** |- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Line length Open
It has a Python interface, therefore it can be easily written in Python, although the core part of the optimization is implemented with C++.- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Multiple consecutive blank lines Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD012 - Multiple consecutive blank lines
Tags: whitespace, blank_lines
Aliases: no-multiple-blanks
This rule is triggered when there are multiple consecutive blank lines in the document:
Some text here
Some more text hereTo fix this, delete the offending lines:
Some text here
Some more text hereNote: this rule will not be triggered if there are multiple consecutive blank lines inside code blocks.