Showing 23 of 23 total issues
Method extract_options
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_options # rubocop:disable MethodLength
@opts = OptionParser.new
@opts.separator 'Register SUSE Linux Enterprise installations with the SUSE Customer Center.'
@opts.separator 'Registration allows access to software repositories (including updates)'
Method execute!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute! # rubocop:disable MethodLength, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity, AbcSize
# check for parameter dependencies
if @config.status
status.print_product_statuses(:json)
elsif @config.status_text
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method execute!
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute! # rubocop:disable MethodLength, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity, AbcSize
# check for parameter dependencies
if @config.status
status.print_product_statuses(:json)
elsif @config.status_text
Class Client
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Client
include SUSE::Toolkit::Utilities
include Logger
attr_reader :config, :api
Method json_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def json_request(method, path, params = {})
# for :get requests, the params need to go to the url, for other requests into the body
if method == :get
request = VERB_TO_CLASS[method].new(path_with_params(path, params))
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method execute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute(cmd, quiet = true, valid_exit_codes = [0]) # rubocop:disable CyclomaticComplexity
log.debug("Executing: '#{cmd}' Quiet: #{quiet}")
output, error, status = execute_raw(cmd)
# Catching interactive failures of zypper. --non-interactive always returns with exit code 0 here
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method json_product_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def json_product_status
statuses = product_statuses.map do |product_status|
status = {}
status[:identifier] = product_status.installed_product.identifier
status[:version] = product_status.installed_product.version
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def announce_system(auth, distro_target = nil, instance_data = nil, namespace = nil)
payload = {
hostname: System.hostname,
hwinfo: System.hwinfo,
distro_target: distro_target || Zypper.distro_target
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_system(auth, distro_target = nil, instance_data = nil, namespace = nil)
payload = {
hostname: System.hostname,
hwinfo: System.hwinfo,
distro_target: distro_target || Zypper.distro_target
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method uuid
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def uuid
if File.exist?('/sys/hypervisor/uuid')
# INFO: bnc#890881 read the uuid generated by the hypervisor (SLES for EC2)
File.read('/sys/hypervisor/uuid').chomp
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method print_information
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def print_information(action)
server = (@config.url == 'https://scc.suse.com') ? 'SUSE Customer Center' : "registration proxy #{@config.url}"
if action == :register
log.info "Registering system to #{server}".bold if @config.url
elsif @config.url
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method uuid
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def uuid
if File.exist?('/sys/hypervisor/uuid')
# INFO: bnc#890881 read the uuid generated by the hypervisor (SLES for EC2)
File.read('/sys/hypervisor/uuid').chomp
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method system_migrations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def system_migrations(auth, products, target_base_product: nil, kind:)
payload = { installed_products: products.map(&:to_params) }
payload[:target_base_product] = target_base_product.to_params if target_base_product
endpoints = {
online: '/connect/systems/products/migrations',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method deregister!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deregister!
if File.exist?('/usr/sbin/registercloudguest') && !@config.product
# exclude the product as de-registering a product
# through SUSEConnect while having registercloudguest set is
# allowed for SCC as proxy cases
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def output
@output ||= execute('lscpu', false).split("\n").each_with_object({}) do |line, hash|
k, v = line.split(':')
hash[k] = v.strip if v
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def output
@output ||= execute('lscpu', false).split("\n").each_with_object({}) do |line, hash|
k, v = line.split(':')
hash[k] = v.strip if v
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method extract_extensions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_extensions(product)
extensions = []
product.extensions.each do |extension|
extensions << {
available: extension.available.nil? ? true : extension.available,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(endpoint, language: nil, insecure: false, debug: false, verify_callback: nil)
endpoint = prefix_protocol(endpoint)
uri = URI.parse(endpoint)
http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_system_token!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_system_token!(response)
return unless System.credentials?
value = response.to_hash[SUSE::Toolkit::Utilities::SYSTEM_TOKEN_HEADER.downcase]
token = value.first.strip unless value.nil? || value.first.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method verify_callback=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_callback=(callback)
if callback
log.debug "Using custom verify_callback: #{callback.source_location.map(&:to_s).join(':')}"
http.verify_callback = callback
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"