Showing 74 of 98 total issues
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return with_error ? [result, p_err + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * result.abs] : resultAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return q_series(a, x, with_error)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return with_error ? [result, 2.0 * (1.0 + a.abs) * Float::EPSILON * gax.abs] : resultAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return q_asymptotic_uniform_complement a, x, with_errorAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return cdf(a, 0.0, rho1) + cdf(b, 0.0, rho2) - deltaAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return value.nan? ? Float::NAN : valueAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return x <= 1.0e+06 ? q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error) : q_large_x(a, x, with_error)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return series(a.to_f, x.to_f, with_error)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return q_large_x_complement(a, x, with_error)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return p_series(a, x, with_error)Method p_t has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def p_t(df, t)
if df.to_i != df
x = (t + Math.sqrt(t**2 + df)) / (2 * Math.sqrt(t**2 + df))
return Math.regularized_beta(x, df / 2.0, df / 2.0)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pdf has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pdf(x, a, b)
return 0 if x < 0
if x == 0
return 1.quo(b) if a == 1
return 0- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_has_library has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_has_library(library) #:nodoc:
define_singleton_method("has_#{library}?") do
cv = "@@#{library}"
unless class_variable_defined? cv
begin- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"