Showing 374 of 374 total issues
Method cached_action_link_url
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cached_action_link_url(link, record)
@action_links_urls ||= {}
@action_links_urls[link.name_to_cache.to_s] || begin
url_options = cached_action_link_url_options(link, record)
if cache_action_link_url?(link, record)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method condition_for_numeric
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def condition_for_numeric(column, value)
if !value.is_a?(Hash)
['%<search_sql>s = ?', condition_value_for_numeric(column, value)]
elsif ActiveScaffold::Finder::NULL_COMPARATORS.include?(value[:opt])
condition_for_null_type(column, value[:opt])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cached_authorized_for_methods
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cached_authorized_for_methods(options)
key = "#{options[:crud_type]}##{options[:column]}##{options[:action]}"
if is_a? Class
self.class_security_methods ||= {}
self.class_security_methods[key] ||= authorized_for_methods(options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method association_klass_scoped
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def association_klass_scoped(association, klass, record)
if nested? && nested.through_association? && nested.child_association&.through_reflection == association
# only ActiveRecord associations
if nested.association.through_reflection.collection?
nested_parent_record.send(nested.association.through_reflection.name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method datetime_from_to_for_range
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def datetime_from_to_for_range(column, value)
case value['range']
when 'TODAY'
[datetime_now.beginning_of_day, datetime_now.end_of_day]
when 'YESTERDAY'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set(*args)
# TODO: add deprecation unless args.size == 1 && args[0].is_a? Hash
# when deprecation is removed:
# * change list#sorting= to sorting.set(val)
clear
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render_column
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_column(column, record, renders_as, scope = nil, only_value = false, col_class = nil) # rubocop:disable Metrics/ParameterLists
if form_column_is_hidden?(column, record, scope)
# creates an element that can be replaced by the update_columns routine,
# but will not affect the value of the submitted form in this state:
# <dl><input type="hidden" class="<%= column.name %>-input"></dl>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_input_color
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_input_color(column, options, ui_options: column.options)
html = []
options = active_scaffold_input_text_options(options)
if column.null?
no_color = options[:object].send(column.name).nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method estimate_weight
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def estimate_weight
if association&.singular?
400
elsif association&.collection?
500
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_checkbox_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_checkbox_option(option, label_method, associated_ids, checkbox_options, li_options = {})
content_tag(:li, li_options) do
option_id = option.is_a?(Array) ? option[1] : option.id
label = option.is_a?(Array) ? option[0] : option.send(label_method)
check_box_tag(checkbox_options[:name], option_id, associated_ids.include?(option_id), checkbox_options) <<
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sort_collection_by_column
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sort_collection_by_column(collection, column, order)
sorter = column.sort[:method]
collection = collection.sort_by do |record|
value = sorter.is_a?(Proc) ? record.instance_eval(&sorter) : record.instance_eval(sorter.to_s)
value = '' if value.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reverse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reverse(klass = nil)
unless polymorphic? || defined?(@reverse)
@reverse ||= inverse || get_reverse&.name
end
@reverse || (get_reverse(klass)&.name unless klass.nil?)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reverse_match?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reverse_match?(assoc)
return assoc.name == as if as || assoc.polymorphic?
return false if assoc.class_name != inverse_klass&.name
if through?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validator_force_required?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validator_force_required?(val)
return false if val.options[:if] || val.options[:unless]
case val
when ActiveModel::Validations::PresenceValidator
validator_required_on(val)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method display_message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def display_message(message)
message = safe_join message, tag(:br) if message.is_a?(Array)
if (highlights = active_scaffold_config.user.highlight_messages)
message = highlights.inject(message) do |msg, (phrases, highlighter)|
highlight(msg, phrases, highlighter || {})
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method columns_accessor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.columns_accessor(*names, &block)
options = names.extract_options!
self.columns_collections = ((columns_collections || []) + names).uniq
names.each do |name|
columns_writer name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method readonly_through_association?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def readonly_through_association?(columns)
return false unless through_association?
return true if association.through_reflection.options[:through] # create not possible, too many levels
return true if association.source_reflection.options[:through] # create not possible, too many levels
return false if create_through_singular? # create allowed, AS has code for this
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method columns
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def columns
# we want to delay initializing to the @core.columns set for as long as possible. Too soon and .search_sql will not be available to .searchable?
unless defined? @columns
self.columns = @core.columns.collect { |c| c.name if @core.columns._inheritable.include?(c.name) && c.searchable? && c.association.nil? && c.text? }.compact
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search_sql=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_sql=(value)
@search_sql =
if value
value == true || value.is_a?(Proc) ? value : Array(value)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add(column_name, direction = nil)
direction ||= 'ASC'
direction = direction.to_s.upcase
column = get_column(column_name)
raise ArgumentError, "Could not find column #{column_name}" if column.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"