Showing 5 of 7 total issues
Method style_options has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_options(options = {}, acceptable = nil)
if acceptable
options.assert_valid_keys(acceptable)
end
# Filling options- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method static_map has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def static_map(resources, options = {})
title = options.delete(:title) { resources.to_s }
map_type = options.delete(:map) { 'map' }
width = options.delete(:width) { 600 }
height = options.delete(:height) { 450 }Method object has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def object(object, options = {})
gml_id = options.delete(:id) { object.id }
GeoObject('gml:id' => gml_id) do
if options.key?(:style)
@xml.style("\##{options.delete(:style)}")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method view has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def view(options = {})
View {
mapType(options[:type].to_s.upcase) if options[:type]
bounds(options[:bounds]) if options[:bounds]
yield if block_given?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xml2GeoLoc has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.xml2GeoLoc(xml, address="")
doc = REXML::Document.new(xml)
if doc.elements['//GeocoderResponseMetaData/found'] != '0'
geoloc = nil- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"