Preparer
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Preparer struct {
Source map[string]interface{}
Destination Resource
}
Method Preparer.validateMutuallyExclusive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) validateMutuallyExclusive(field reflect.StructField) error {
if mutuallyexclusives, ok := field.Tag.Lookup("mutually_exclusive"); ok {
name := p.getFieldName(field)
exclusives := strings.Split(mutuallyexclusives, ",")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Preparer.convertNumber
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertNumber(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
if val == nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), nil
}
Method Preparer.getValueForField
has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) getValueForField(r Renderer, field reflect.StructField) (reflect.Value, error) {
// get the field name for use in future lookups
name := p.getFieldName(field)
raw, isSet := p.Source[name]
Method Preparer.convertNumber
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) convertNumber(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
if val == nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), nil
}
Method Preparer.convertSlice
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertSlice(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertTime
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertTime(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertMap
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertMap(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertValue
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertValue(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (out reflect.Value, err error) {
Method Preparer.convertDuration
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertDuration(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertNumber
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertNumber(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertPointer
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertPointer(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertInterface
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertInterface(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.Prepare
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) Prepare(ctx context.Context, r Renderer) (Task, error) {
value := reflect.ValueOf(p.Destination)
typ := value.Type()
wasPtr := false // so we can re-wrap later if we need to
Method Preparer.convertMap
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) convertMap(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
if val == nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), nil
}
Method Preparer.convertDuration
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) convertDuration(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
if val == nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), nil
}
Method Preparer.convertTime
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Preparer) convertTime(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
if val == nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), nil
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case reflect.Int, reflect.Int8, reflect.Int16, reflect.Int32, reflect.Int64:
raw, err := strconv.ParseInt(num, base, typ.Bits())
if err != nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), errors.Wrapf(err, "could not convert %s to %s", num, typ.Kind())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 217.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case reflect.Uint, reflect.Uint8, reflect.Uint16, reflect.Uint32, reflect.Uint64:
raw, err := strconv.ParseUint(num, base, typ.Bits())
if err != nil {
return reflect.Zero(typ), errors.Wrapf(err, "could not convert %s to %s", num, typ.Kind())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 217.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a newline Open
errs := fmt.Errorf("could not convert %s to time.Time any of:\n1. %v\n2. %v\n3. %v\n", name, ztErr, ltErr, stErr)
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
// Copyright © 2016 Asteris, LLC
- Exclude checks