asteris-llc/converge

View on GitHub
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func (m *DbusMock) ReloadUnit(name string, mode string, ch chan<- string) (int, error) {
    args := m.Called(name, mode, ch)
    if m.reloadResp != "" && ch != nil {
        go func() {
            ch <- m.reloadResp
Severity: Major
Found in resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 66..74
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 76..84
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 86..94

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 125.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func (m *DbusMock) StartUnit(name string, mode string, ch chan<- string) (int, error) {
    args := m.Called(name, mode, ch)
    if m.startResp != "" && ch != nil {
        go func() {
            ch <- m.startResp
Severity: Major
Found in resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 76..84
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 86..94
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 96..104

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 125.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func (m *DbusMock) StopUnit(name string, mode string, ch chan<- string) (int, error) {
    args := m.Called(name, mode, ch)
    if m.stopResp != "" && ch != nil {
        go func() {
            ch <- m.stopResp
Severity: Major
Found in resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 66..74
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 86..94
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 96..104

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 125.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func (m *DbusMock) RestartUnit(name string, mode string, ch chan<- string) (int, error) {
    args := m.Called(name, mode, ch)
    if m.restartResp != "" && ch != nil {
        go func() {
            ch <- m.restartResp
Severity: Major
Found in resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 66..74
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 76..84
resource/systemd/unit/linux_mocks_test.go on lines 96..104

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 125.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code!
Open

// Copyright © 2016 Asteris, LLC

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status