Showing 39 of 39 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
async checkForPrimitive(): Promise<undefined> {
const platform = os.platform()
const primitivePath = path.join(
VENDOR_DIR,
`primitive-${platform}-${os.arch()}${platform === 'win32' ? '.exe' : ''}`
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 219.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
async checkForTriangle(): Promise<undefined> {
const platform = os.platform()
const trianglePath = path.join(
VENDOR_DIR,
`triangle-${platform}-${os.arch()}${platform === 'win32' ? '.exe' : ''}`
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 219.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
builds.forEach((build) => {
const { os, arch, filename } = build
const path = resolve(__dirname, '..', 'primitive-binaries', filename)
if (existsSync(path)) {
console.log(`Primitive executable for ${os} (${arch}) already exists`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
builds.forEach((build) => {
const { os, arch, filename } = build
const path = resolve(__dirname, '..', 'triangle-binaries', filename)
if (existsSync(path)) {
console.log(`Triangle executable for ${os} (${arch}) already exists`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File sqip.ts
has 402 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import path from 'path'
import Debug from 'debug'
import fs from 'fs-extra'
Function processFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function processFile({
filePath,
buffer,
outputFileName,
config
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function apply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function apply
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
Function sqipCLI
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default async function sqipCLI(): Promise<undefined> {
const pluginDetectionArgs = commandLineArgs(defaultOptionList, {
partial: true
})
Function cliOptions
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static get cliOptions(): SqipCliOptionDefinition[] {
return [
{
name: 'color',
type: String,
Function cliOptions
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static get cliOptions(): SqipCliOptionDefinition[] {
return [
{ name: 'bl', type: Number, description: 'Blur radius', defaultValue: 2 },
{
name: 'nf',
Function sqip
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function sqip(
options: SqipOptions
): Promise<SqipResult | SqipResult[]> {
// Build configuration based on passed options and default options
const defaultOptions = {
Function apply
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
Function apply
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
Function apply
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
Function apply
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async apply(
imageBuffer: Buffer,
metadata: SqipImageMetadata
): Promise<Buffer> {
if (metadata.type === 'svg') {
Function cliOptions
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static get cliOptions(): SqipCliOptionDefinition[] {
return [
{
name: 'numberOfPrimitives',
alias: 'n',
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const builds = [
{
os: 'darwin',
arch: 'amd64',
filename: 'triangle-darwin-x64'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const builds = [
{
os: 'darwin',
arch: 'amd64',
filename: 'primitive-darwin-x64'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function findBackgroundColor
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function findBackgroundColor(imageBuffer: Buffer): Promise<string> {
const image = sharp(imageBuffer)
const { width, height } = await image.metadata()
if (!width || !height) {