Sign upLogin

bellycard/napa

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 11 of 11 total issues

Method new has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def new(name, path = nil)
        say 'Generating scaffold...'

        @name = name
        @path = path
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/cli/base/new.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def parse(column_definition)
          name, type, has_index = column_definition.split(':')

          # if user provided "name:index" instead of "name:string:index"
          # type should be set blank so GeneratedAttribute's constructor
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/cli/generated_attribute.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def call(message, backtrace, options = {}, _env = nil)
            result = message.is_a?(Napa::JsonError) ? message : Napa::JsonError.new(:api_error, message)

            if (options[:rescue_options] || {})[:backtrace] && backtrace && !backtrace.empty?
              result = result.to_h.merge(backtrace: backtrace)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/grape_extensions/error_formatter.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method next_level has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def next_level(level)
        fail 'Unidentified Level' unless [:major, :minor, :patch].include?(level)

        parts = Napa::VERSION.split('.').map { |p| p.to_i }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/version.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_migration_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def create_migration_file
        return unless options[:migration] && options[:parent].nil?
        if options[:indexes] == false
          attributes.each { |a| a.attr_options.delete(:index) if a.reference? && !a.has_index? }
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/cli/model.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def options
          {}.tap do |o|
            o[:layout] = Logging.layouts.json if Napa::Logger.config.format == :json
            o[:layout] = Logging.layouts.yaml if Napa::Logger.config.format == :yaml
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/logger/output/file.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/napa/logger/output/stdout.rb on lines 11..14

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def options
          {}.tap do |o|
            o[:layout] = Logging.layouts.json if Napa::Logger.config.format == :json
            o[:layout] = Logging.layouts.yaml if Napa::Logger.config.format == :yaml
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/logger/output/stdout.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/napa/logger/output/file.rb on lines 11..14

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method format_request has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def format_request(env)
        request = Rack::Request.new(env)
        params  = request.params

        begin
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/middleware/logger.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def call(env)
        if authenticated_request?(env)
          @app.call(env)
        else
          if !(@old_allowed_passwords.blank? && @allowed_header_passwords.blank?)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/middleware/authentication.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method authenticated_request? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def authenticated_request?(env)
        return if @old_allowed_passwords.blank? && @allowed_header_passwords.blank?

        if env['HTTP_PASSWORDS'].present?
          possible_passwords = env['HTTP_PASSWORDS'].to_s.split(',')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/middleware/authentication.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method emitter has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def emitter
        unless @emitter
          # Log an error if StatsD settings are not configured
          message = 'StatsD host and port not configured in environment variables, using default settings'
          Napa::Logger.logger.warn message unless ENV['STATSD_HOST'] && ENV['STATSD_PORT']
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/napa/stats.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language