Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Method type_cast
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_cast(value, arrayize: true)
if array && (arrayize || value.is_a?(Array))
return [] if arrayize && !value.is_a?(Array)
return value.map { |v| type_cast(v, arrayize: false) }
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method typed_store
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def typed_store(store_attribute, options={}, &block)
unless self < Behavior
include Behavior
class_attribute :typed_stores, :store_accessors, instance_accessor: false
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method typed_store
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def typed_store(store_attribute, options={}, &block)
unless self < Behavior
include Behavior
class_attribute :typed_stores, :store_accessors, instance_accessor: false
end
Method initialize
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(store_name, options)
@coder = options.fetch(:coder) { default_coder(store_name) }
@store_name = store_name
@prefix =
case options[:prefix]
Method cast
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cast(value)
casted_value = type_cast(value)
if !blank
casted_value = default if casted_value.blank?
elsif array && has_default?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method attribute?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def attribute?(attr_name)
if self.class.store_accessors.include?(attr_name.to_s)
value = public_send(attr_name)
case value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"