get_command has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_command(self, project_file, props_file_path=None, targets=None, upgrade_project=True, build_type=None, arch=None, parallel=True, toolset=None, platforms=None, use_env=False, properties=None, output_binary_log=None, verbosity=None, user_property_file_name=None):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
build has 18 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build(self, project_file, targets=None, upgrade_project=True, build_type=None, arch=None,
get_command has 14 arguments (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_command(self, project_file, props_file_path=None, targets=None, upgrade_project=True,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if self._conanfile.settings.get_safe("compiler") == "Intel" and \ self._conanfile.settings.get_safe("compiler.base") == "Visual Studio":
- Read upRead up
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
This issue has a mass of 38.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
self._conanfile.settings.get_safe("compiler.base") == "Visual Studio":
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets and braces, or using a hanging indent. When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied: - there should be no arguments on the first line, and - further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself as a continuation line. Okay: a = (\n) E123: a = (\n ) Okay: a = (\n 42) E121: a = (\n 42) E122: a = (\n42) E123: a = (\n 42\n ) E124: a = (24,\n 42\n) E125: if (\n b):\n pass E126: a = (\n 42) E127: a = (24,\n 42) E128: a = (24,\n 42) E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)