View on GitHub


6 hrs
Test Coverage

Function _download_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.

    def _download_file(self, url, auth, headers, file_path, try_resume=False):
        t1 = time.time()
        if try_resume and file_path and os.path.exists(file_path):
            range_start = os.path.getsize(file_path)
            headers = headers.copy() if headers else {}
Severity: Minor
Found in conans/client/downloaders/ - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.

    def __init__(self, requester, output, verify, config_retry, config_retry_wait):
        self._output = output
        self._requester = requester
        self._verify_ssl = verify
        self._config_retry = config_retry
Severity: Major
Found in conans/client/downloaders/ and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
conans/client/graph/ on lines 43..48
conans/client/ on lines 62..67

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).


This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.


Further Reading

Visually indented line with same indent as next logical line

                    and response.headers.get("Accept-Ranges") == "bytes"):

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

There are no issues that match your filters.