Showing 95 of 95 total issues
Function has too many statements (34). Maximum allowed is 30. Open
block.click( function( event, event_params )
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks (max-statements)
The max-statements
rule allows you to specify the maximum number of statements allowed in a function.
function foo() {
var bar = 1; // one statement
var baz = 2; // two statements
var qux = 3; // three statements
}
Rule Details
This rule enforces a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks.
Options
This rule has a number or object option:
-
"max"
(default10
) enforces a maximum number of statements allows in function blocks
Deprecated: The object property maximum
is deprecated; please use the object property max
instead.
This rule has an object option:
-
"ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true
ignores top-level functions
max
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
};
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
ignoreTopLevelFunctions
Examples of additional correct code for this rule with the { "max": 10 }, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }
options:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }]*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11;
}
Related Rules
- [complexity](complexity.md)
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function add
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UrlBuilder.prototype.add = function( params, value )
{
if( params instanceof Array )
{
for( var i = 0; i < params.length; i++ )
Cyclomatic complexity for join_reflection_without_through is too high. [9/6] Open
def join_reflection_without_through(reflection, table)
klass = reflection.active_record
other_class = reflection.klass
table1 = table || klass.arel_table
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method has_error?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_error?(error_message, options = {})
error_found = false
if options[:field]
first('.field.has-error', minimum: 1) # wait for any errors to come from validation
all(".field.has-error", wait: false).each do |field_container|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [32/30] Open
def join_reflection_without_through(reflection, table)
klass = reflection.active_record
other_class = reflection.klass
table1 = table || klass.arel_table
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Function has a complexity of 8. Open
body.on('contentreplace', function(e, content, selector)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
new_item.css({ opacity: 1 }).hide();
new_item.fadeIn( 'fast', function()
{
new_item.trigger( 'nestedfieldsitemadd', event_params );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
new_item.css({ opacity: 1 }).hide();
new_item.fadeIn( 'normal', function()
{
new_item.trigger( 'nestedfieldsitemadd', event_params);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Cyclomatic complexity for has_error? is too high. [8/6] Open
def has_error?(error_message, options = {})
error_found = false
if options[:field]
first('.field.has-error', minimum: 1) # wait for any errors to come from validation
all(".field.has-error", wait: false).each do |field_container|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for releaf_button_content is too high. [7/6] Open
def releaf_button_content( text, icon, attributes = {} )
if text.blank? && icon.present?
raise ArgumentError, "Title is required for icon-only buttons" if attributes[:title].blank?
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Function has a complexity of 7. Open
jQuery( document ).on( 'validation:ok validation:error validation:fail', 'form', function( event, validator )
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 7. Open
block.find('.date-picker, .datetime-picker, .time-picker').each(function()
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function init
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( editor )
{
var me = this;
CKEDITOR.dialog.add( 'MediaEmbedDialog', function (instance)
{
Method store_settings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def store_settings
settings = params.permit(settings: [:key, :value]).to_h.fetch(:settings, nil)
if settings
settings.each do|item|
next if item[:key].nil? || item[:value].nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fields.bind('localizationmenutoggle', function()
{
var field = jQuery(this);
var event = (field.attr('data-localization-menu-open')) ? 'localizationmenuclose' : 'localizationmenuopen';
field.trigger( event );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
first_level_side_items.on('sidecompacttoggle', function()
{
var item = jQuery(this);
var event = (item.is('.open')) ? 'sidecompactitemclose' : 'sidecompactitemopen';
item.trigger( event );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
toolboxes.bind('toolboxtoggle', function()
{
var toolbox = jQuery(this);
var event = (toolbox.attr('data-toolbox-open')) ? 'toolboxclose' : 'toolboxopen';
toolbox.trigger( event );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method join_reflection_without_through
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def join_reflection_without_through(reflection, table)
klass = reflection.active_record
other_class = reflection.klass
table1 = table || klass.arel_table
Method verify_resources_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_resources_config(resource_config)
# perform some basic config structure validation
unless resource_config.is_a? Hash
raise Releaf::Error, "Releaf.application.config.content.resources must be a Hash"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method releaf_resources
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def releaf_resources(*args)
resources(*args) do
yield if block_given?
member do
get :confirm_destroy if route_enabled?(:destroy, args.last)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"