Sign upLogin

datacite/cheetoh

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 16 of 16 total issues

Method put_doi has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def put_doi(doi, options={})
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Username or password missing" }] }) unless options[:username].present? && options[:password].present?
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Not a valid HTTP(S) or FTP URL" }] }) unless options[:url].blank? || /\A(http|https|ftp):\/\/[\S]+/.match(options[:url])

      # update doi status
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method post_doi has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def post_doi(doi, options={})
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Username or password missing" }] }) unless options[:username].present? && options[:password].present?
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Not a valid HTTP(S) or FTP URL" }] }) unless options[:url].blank? || /\A(http|https|ftp):\/\/[\S]+/.match(options[:url])

      # update doi status
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mint has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def mint
    fail IdentifierError, "no _profile provided" unless profile_present?(safe_params)
    fail IdentifierError, "no _target provided" if (safe_params[:_target].blank? && safe_params[:_status] != "reserved")

    # make sure we generate a random DOI that is not already used
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method ez_response has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def ez_response(response, options={})
      options[:profile] ||= :datacite 
      attributes = response.dig("data", "attributes").to_h

      status = STATES[attributes["state"]] || "public"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method post_doi has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def post_doi(doi, options={})
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Username or password missing" }] }) unless options[:username].present? && options[:password].present?
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Not a valid HTTP(S) or FTP URL" }] }) unless options[:url].blank? || /\A(http|https|ftp):\/\/[\S]+/.match(options[:url])

      # update doi status
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method put_doi has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def put_doi(doi, options={})
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Username or password missing" }] }) unless options[:username].present? && options[:password].present?
      return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Not a valid HTTP(S) or FTP URL" }] }) unless options[:url].blank? || /\A(http|https|ftp):\/\/[\S]+/.match(options[:url])

      # update doi status
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          if [200, 201].include?(response.status)
      render plain: ez_response(response.body, profile: @profile).to_anvl, status: :ok
    elsif [401, 403].include?(response.status)
      response.headers.delete_if { |key| key == 'X-Credential-Username' }
      render plain: "error: unauthorized", status: :unauthorized
      Severity: Major
      Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 84..92
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 113..121

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 64.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          if [200, 201].include?(response.status)
      render plain: ez_response(response.body, profile: @profile).to_anvl, status: :ok
    elsif [401, 403].include?(response.status)
      response.headers.delete_if { |key| key == 'X-Credential-Username' }
      render plain: "error: unauthorized", status: :unauthorized
      Severity: Major
      Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 52..60
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 113..121

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 64.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          if [200, 201].include?(response.status)
      render plain: ez_response(response.body, profile: @profile).to_anvl, status: :ok
    elsif [401, 403].include?(response.status)
      response.headers.delete_if { |key| key == 'X-Credential-Username' }
      render plain: "error: unauthorized", status: :unauthorized
      Severity: Major
      Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 52..60
      app/controllers/dois_controller.rb on lines 84..92

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 64.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def create
    doi = validate_doi(params[:id])
    fail IdentifierError, "ark identifiers are not supported by this service" if is_ark?(params[:id])
    fail IdentifierError, "no doi provided" unless doi.present?
    fail IdentifierError, "no _profile provided" unless profile_present?(safe_params)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method mint has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def mint
    fail IdentifierError, "no _profile provided" unless profile_present?(safe_params)
    fail IdentifierError, "no _target provided" if (safe_params[:_target].blank? && safe_params[:_status] != "reserved")

    # make sure we generate a random DOI that is not already used
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method encode_doi has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def encode_doi(prefix, options={})
      prefix = validate_prefix(prefix)
      return nil unless prefix.present?

      number = options[:number].to_s.scan(/\d+/).join("").to_i
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              if options[:target_status] == "reserved" || doi.start_with?("10.5072") then
        reason = nil
        event = nil
      elsif options[:target_status].to_s.start_with?("unavailable")
        reason = separate_reason(options[:target_status].to_s)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb on lines 93..102

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              if options[:target_status] == "reserved" || doi.start_with?("10.5072")
        reason = nil
        event = nil
      elsif options[:target_status].to_s.start_with?("unavailable") 
        reason = separate_reason(options[:target_status].to_s)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        app/controllers/concerns/doiable.rb on lines 158..167

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method destroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def destroy
    response = DoisController.get_doi(@doi)
    fail AbstractController::ActionNotFound unless response.status == 200
    fail IdentifierError, "#{params[:id]} is not a reserved DOI" unless response.body.dig("data", "attributes", "state") == "draft"
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method update has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def update
    fail IdentifierError, "No _profile, _target or _status provided" unless
      safe_params[@profile].present? ||
      safe_params[:_target].present? ||
      safe_params[:_status].present?
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/dois_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language