Function ajaxSubmit
has 244 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.ajaxSubmit = function(options) {
// fast fail if nothing selected (http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/2752)
if (!this.length) {
log('ajaxSubmit: skipping submit process - no element selected');
return this;
Function fileUpload
has 156 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fileUpload() {
var form = $form[0];
if ($(':input[name=submit]', form).length) {
alert('Error: Form elements must not be named "submit".');
File jquery.form.js
has 424 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery Form Plugin
* version: 2.43 (12-MAR-2010)
* @requires jQuery v1.3.2 or later
*
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (successful && (!n || el.disabled || t == 'reset' || t == 'button' ||
(t == 'checkbox' || t == 'radio') && !el.checked ||
(t == 'submit' || t == 'image') && el.form && el.form.clk != el ||
tag == 'select' && el.selectedIndex == -1))
return null;
Function cb
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cb() {
if (cbInvoked)
return;
var ok = true;
Function formToArray
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.formToArray = function(semantic) {
var a = [];
if (this.length == 0) return a;
var form = this[0];
Function doSubmit
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doSubmit() {
// make sure form attrs are set
var t = $form.attr('target'), a = $form.attr('action');
// update form attrs in IE friendly way
Function ajaxForm
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.ajaxForm = function(options) {
return this.ajaxFormUnbind().bind('submit.form-plugin', function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
$(this).ajaxSubmit(options);
}).bind('click.form-plugin', function(e) {
Function fieldValue
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fieldValue = function(el, successful) {
var n = el.name, t = el.type, tag = el.tagName.toLowerCase();
if (typeof successful == 'undefined') successful = true;
if (successful && (!n || el.disabled || t == 'reset' || t == 'button' ||
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return el.value;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (v && v.constructor == Array) {
for(var j=0, jmax=v.length; j < jmax; j++)
a.push({name: n, value: v[j]});
}
else if (v !== null && typeof v != 'undefined')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (v && v.constructor == Array) {
for (var i=0,max=v.length; i < max; i++)
a.push({name: n, value: v[i]});
}
else if (v !== null && typeof v != 'undefined')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
a.push({name: n+'.x', value: form.clk_x}, {name: n+'.y', value: form.clk_y});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
a.push({name: n+'.x', value: form.clk_x}, {name: n+'.y', value: form.clk_y});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76