eagletmt/faml

View on GitHub

Showing 20 of 20 total issues

Method collect_attribute_info has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def collect_attribute_info(info, ast)
      if ast.object_ref
        info.object_reference_count += 1
        return
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/faml/stats.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method compile has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def compile(ast)
      if !ast.object_ref && !ast.old_attributes && !ast.new_attributes
        return compile_static_id_and_class(ast.static_id, ast.static_class)
      end

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/faml/attribute_compiler.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method collect_attribute_info has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def collect_attribute_info(info, ast)
      if ast.object_ref
        info.object_reference_count += 1
        return
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/faml/stats.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method compile_html_comment has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def compile_html_comment(ast)
          if ast.children.empty?
            if ast.conditional.empty?
              [:html, :comment, [:static, " #{ast.comment} "]]
            else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/faml/compiler.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method walk_ast has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def walk_ast(info, ast)
          info.ast_types[ast.class.to_s.sub(/\A.*::(.+)\z/, '\1')] += 1
          case ast
          when HamlParser::Ast::Root
            ast.children.each { |c| walk_ast(info, c) }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/faml/stats.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method compile_slow_attributes has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def compile_slow_attributes(old_attributes, new_attributes, static_id, static_class, object_ref)
            h = {}
            unless static_class.empty?
              h[:class] = static_class
            end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/faml/attribute_compiler.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method walk_ast has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def walk_ast(info, ast)
            info.ast_types[ast.class.to_s.sub(/\A.*::(.+)\z/, '\1')] += 1
            case ast
            when HamlParser::Ast::Root
              ast.children.each { |c| walk_ast(info, c) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/faml/stats.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method compile_element has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def compile_element(ast)
            temple = [
              :haml, :tag,
              ast.tag_name,
              self_closing?(ast),
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/faml/compiler.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method try_static_value has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def try_static_value(key_static, node, force_static: false)
            case node.type
            when :sym, :int, :float, :str, :rational, :complex
              set_static_attribute(key_static, node.children[0])
            when :true
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/faml/static_hash_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method compile_interpolation has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def compile_interpolation(text, lineno, escape_html: @escape_html)
              s = StringScanner.new(text)
              temple = [:multi]
              pos = s.pos
              while s.scan_until(INTERPOLATION_BEGIN)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/faml/text_compiler.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method on_haml_tag has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def on_haml_tag(name, self_closing, attrs, content = nil)
              name = name.to_s
              closed = self_closing && (!content || empty_exp?(content))
              result = [:multi, [:static, "<#{name}"], compile(attrs)]
              result << [:static, (closed && @format != :html ? ' /' : '') + '>']
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/faml/html.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        module Faml
          module FilterCompilers
            class Scss < TiltBase
              def compile(ast)
                temple = [:multi, [:static, "\n"], [:newline]]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/faml/filter_compilers/scss.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        lib/faml/filter_compilers/sass.rb on lines 4..15

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 38.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        module Faml
          module FilterCompilers
            class Sass < TiltBase
              def compile(ast)
                temple = [:multi, [:static, "\n"], [:newline]]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/faml/filter_compilers/sass.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        lib/faml/filter_compilers/scss.rb on lines 4..15

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 38.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method compile_slow_attributes has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def compile_slow_attributes(old_attributes, new_attributes, static_id, static_class, object_ref)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/faml/attribute_compiler.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Method suppress_code_newline? has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def suppress_code_newline?(ast)
                ast.is_a?(HamlParser::Ast::Script) ||
                  ast.is_a?(HamlParser::Ast::SilentScript) ||
                  (ast.is_a?(HamlParser::Ast::Element) && suppress_code_newline?(ast.oneline_child)) ||
                  (ast.is_a?(HamlParser::Ast::Element) && !ast.children.empty?) ||
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/compiler.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method on_multi has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def on_multi(*exprs)
                i = exprs.size - 1
                marker = false
                while i >= 0
                  case exprs[i]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/newline.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method on_multi has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def on_multi(*exprs)
                i = exprs.size - 1
                depth = 0
                while i >= 0
                  case exprs[i]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/script_end.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method compile_static_id_and_class has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def compile_static_id_and_class(static_id, static_class)
                [:html, :attrs].tap do |html_attrs|
                  unless static_class.empty?
                    html_attrs << [:haml, :attr, 'class', [:static, static_class]]
                  end
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/attribute_compiler.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method optimizable? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def optimizable?(old_attributes, new_attributes, static_attributes, dynamic_attributes)
                if static_attributes.nil?
                  return false
                end
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/attribute_optimizer.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method try_optimize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def try_optimize(old_attributes, new_attributes, static_id, static_class)
                parser = StaticHashParser.new
                unless parser.parse("{#{new_attributes}#{old_attributes}}")
                  assert_valid_ruby_code!(old_attributes)
                  return [nil, nil]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/faml/attribute_optimizer.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Severity
          Category
          Status
          Source
          Language