Class has too many lines. [148/100] Open
class Criterion < ScoredQuestion
include ActionView::Helpers
validates :size, presence: true
# This method returns what to display if an instructor (etc.) is creating or editing a questionnaire (questionnaires_controller.rb)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length a class exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for edit is too high. [90.14/15] Open
def edit(_count)
html = '<td align="center"><a rel="nofollow" data-method="delete" href="/questions/' + id.to_s + '">Remove</a></td>'
html += '<td><input size="6" value="' + seq.to_s + '" name="question[' + id.to_s + '][seq]"'
html += ' id="question_' + id.to_s + '_seq" type="text"></td>'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for scale_criterion_question is too high. [86.18/15] Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for view_completed_question is too high. [59.74/15] Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for dropdown_criterion_question is too high. [52.74/15] Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
current_value = ''
current_value += 'data-current-rating =' + answer.answer.to_s unless answer.nil?
html = '<div><select id="responses_' + count.to_s + '_score" name="responses[' + count.to_s + '][score]" class="review-rating" ' + current_value + '>'
html += "<option value = ''>--</option>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for advices_criterion_question is too high. [44.65/15] Open
def advices_criterion_question(count, question_advices)
html = '<a id="showAdvice_' + id.to_s + '" onclick="showAdvice(' + id.to_s + ')">Show advice</a><script>'
html += 'function showAdvice(i){var element = document.getElementById("showAdvice_" + i.toString());'
html += 'var show = element.innerHTML == "Hide advice";'
html += 'if (show){element.innerHTML="Show advice";} else{element.innerHTML="Hide advice";}toggleAdvice(i);}'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for view_question_text is too high. [43.73/15] Open
def view_question_text
html = '<TD align="left"> ' + txt + ' </TD>'
html += '<TD align="left">' + type + '</TD>'
html += '<td align="center">' + weight.to_s + '</TD>'
questionnaire = self.questionnaire
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [34/10] Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [31/10] Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for complete is too high. [29.77/15] Open
def complete(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max, dropdown_or_scale)
html = '<div><label for="responses_' + count.to_s + '">' + txt + '</label></div>'
question_advices = QuestionAdvice.where(question_id: id).sort_by(&:id)
advice_total_length = 0
question_advices.each do |question_advice|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for view_completed_question is too high. [14/6] Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for view_completed_question is too high. [15/7] Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Cyclomatic complexity for scale_criterion_question is too high. [12/6] Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for scale_criterion_question is too high. [13/7] Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [16/10] Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
current_value = ''
current_value += 'data-current-rating =' + answer.answer.to_s unless answer.nil?
html = '<div><select id="responses_' + count.to_s + '_score" name="responses[' + count.to_s + '][score]" class="review-rating" ' + current_value + '>'
html += "<option value = ''>--</option>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method view_completed_question
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def advices_criterion_question(count, question_advices)
html = '<a id="showAdvice_' + id.to_s + '" onclick="showAdvice(' + id.to_s + ')">Show advice</a><script>'
html += 'function showAdvice(i){var element = document.getElementById("showAdvice_" + i.toString());'
html += 'var show = element.innerHTML == "Hide advice";'
html += 'if (show){element.innerHTML="Show advice";} else{element.innerHTML="Hide advice";}toggleAdvice(i);}'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def edit(_count)
html = '<td align="center"><a rel="nofollow" data-method="delete" href="/questions/' + id.to_s + '">Remove</a></td>'
html += '<td><input size="6" value="' + seq.to_s + '" name="question[' + id.to_s + '][seq]"'
html += ' id="question_' + id.to_s + '_seq" type="text"></td>'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for dropdown_criterion_question is too high. [10/6] Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
current_value = ''
current_value += 'data-current-rating =' + answer.answer.to_s unless answer.nil?
html = '<div><select id="responses_' + count.to_s + '_score" name="responses[' + count.to_s + '][score]" class="review-rating" ' + current_value + '>'
html += "<option value = ''>--</option>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for dropdown_criterion_question is too high. [10/7] Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
current_value = ''
current_value += 'data-current-rating =' + answer.answer.to_s unless answer.nil?
html = '<div><select id="responses_' + count.to_s + '_score" name="responses[' + count.to_s + '][score]" class="review-rating" ' + current_value + '>'
html += "<option value = ''>--</option>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method scale_criterion_question
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [11/10] Open
def view_question_text
html = '<TD align="left"> ' + txt + ' </TD>'
html += '<TD align="left">' + type + '</TD>'
html += '<td align="center">' + weight.to_s + '</TD>'
questionnaire = self.questionnaire
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for complete is too high. [7/6] Open
def complete(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max, dropdown_or_scale)
html = '<div><label for="responses_' + count.to_s + '">' + txt + '</label></div>'
question_advices = QuestionAdvice.where(question_id: id).sort_by(&:id)
advice_total_length = 0
question_advices.each do |question_advice|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method view_completed_question
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
html = '<b>' + count.to_s + '. ' + txt + ' [Max points: ' + questionnaire_max.to_s + ']</b>'
score = answer && !answer.answer.nil? ? answer.answer.to_s : '-'
score_percent = score != '-' ? answer.answer * 1.0 / questionnaire_max : 0
score_color = if score_percent > 0.8
Method scale_criterion_question
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
if size.nil? || size.blank?
cols = '70'
rows = '1'
else
Method dropdown_criterion_question
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
current_value = ''
current_value += 'data-current-rating =' + answer.answer.to_s unless answer.nil?
html = '<div><select id="responses_' + count.to_s + '_score" name="responses[' + count.to_s + '][score]" class="review-rating" ' + current_value + '>'
html += "<option value = ''>--</option>"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complete
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max, dropdown_or_scale)
Method view_completed_question
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def view_completed_question(count, answer, questionnaire_max, tag_prompt_deployments = nil, current_user = nil)
Method complete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max, dropdown_or_scale)
html = '<div><label for="responses_' + count.to_s + '">' + txt + '</label></div>'
question_advices = QuestionAdvice.where(question_id: id).sort_by(&:id)
advice_total_length = 0
question_advices.each do |question_advice|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Optional arguments should appear at the end of the argument list. Open
def complete(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max, dropdown_or_scale)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for optional arguments to methods that do not come at the end of the argument list
Example:
# bad
def foo(a = 1, b, c)
end
# good
def baz(a, b, c = 1)
end
def foobar(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end
Optional arguments should appear at the end of the argument list. Open
def dropdown_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for optional arguments to methods that do not come at the end of the argument list
Example:
# bad
def foo(a = 1, b, c)
end
# good
def baz(a, b, c = 1)
end
def foobar(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end
Optional arguments should appear at the end of the argument list. Open
def scale_criterion_question(count, answer = nil, questionnaire_min, questionnaire_max)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for optional arguments to methods that do not come at the end of the argument list
Example:
# bad
def foo(a = 1, b, c)
end
# good
def baz(a, b, c = 1)
end
def foobar(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end