Showing 71 of 71 total issues
Method start
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start(args = {})
default_args= {:issue_id => nil, :comments => nil, :activity_id => nil, :project_id => nil}
args = default_args.merge(args)
@time_tracker = get_current
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stop
# due to the only_one_tracker validation we only could stop the active tracker
if self.valid?
# saving an TimeLog and destroying the TimeTracker have to be executed as a transaction, because we don't want to
# track all time without any data loss.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete
if help.permission_checker([:tt_edit_own_time_logs, :tt_edit_time_logs], {}, true)
time_logs = TimeLog.where(:id => params[:time_log_ids]).all
time_logs.each do |item|
if item.user == User.current && User.current.allowed_to_globally?(:tt_edit_own_time_logs, {}) || User.current.allowed_to_globally?(:tt_edit_time_logs, {})
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class TimeBooking
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TimeBooking < ActiveRecord::Base
include Redmine::I18n
unloadable
attr_accessible :started_on, :stopped_at, :time_entry_id, :time_log_id, :project, :project_id
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def time_bookings_query
@query_bookings ||= if params[:set_filter] == '3' || session[:tt_user_bookings_query].nil?
query = TimeBookingQuery.new :name => 'x', :filters => {}
query.build_from_params(params)
session[:tt_user_bookings_query] = {:filters => query.filters, :group_by => query.group_by, :column_names => query.column_names}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def time_logs_query
@query_logs ||= if params[:set_filter] == '2' || session[:tt_user_logs_query].nil?
query = TimeLogQuery.new :name => 'x', :filters => {}
query.build_from_params(params)
session[:tt_user_logs_query] = {:filters => query.filters, :group_by => query.group_by, :column_names => query.column_names}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method stop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stop
@time_tracker = get_current
if @time_tracker.new_record?
flash[:error] = l(:no_time_tracker_running)
unless request.xhr?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sql_for_tt_start_date_field
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sql_for_tt_start_date_field(field, operator, value)
start_date = "DATE(#{self.queried_class.table_name}.started_on)"
case operator
when "="
"#{start_date} = '#{Time.parse(value[0]).to_date}'"
Method time_string2hour
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def time_string2hour(str)
sec = 0
if str.match(/\d\d?:\d\d?:\d\d?/) #parse general input form hh:mm:ss
arr = str.strip.split(':')
sec = arr[0].to_i * 3600 + arr[1].to_i * 60 + arr[2].to_i
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@query = TimeBookingQuery.new(params[:query])
@query.user = User.current
@query.project = params[:query_is_for_all] ? nil : @project
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@query = TimeLogQuery.new(params[:query])
@query.user = User.current
@query.project = params[:query_is_for_all] ? nil : @project
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method fetch_chart_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch_chart_data
@chart_data = Array.new
@chart_ticks = Array.new
@highlighter_data = Array.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method start
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start(args = {})
default_args= {:issue_id => nil, :comments => nil, :activity_id => nil, :project_id => nil}
args = default_args.merge(args)
@time_tracker = get_current
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@query.attributes = params[:query]
@query.project = nil if params[:query_is_for_all]
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
@query.build_from_params(params)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@query.attributes = params[:query]
@query.project = nil if params[:query_is_for_all]
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
@query.build_from_params(params)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete
if help.permission_checker([:tt_edit_own_bookings, :tt_edit_bookings], {}, true)
time_bookings = TimeBooking.where(:id => params[:time_booking_ids]).all
time_bookings.each do |item|
if item.user == User.current && User.current.allowed_to?(:tt_edit_own_bookings, item.project) || User.current.allowed_to?(:tt_edit_bookings, item.project)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
@time_tracker = get_current_time_tracker
@limit = 15 # limit for both lists
Method stop
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stop
@time_tracker = get_current
if @time_tracker.new_record?
flash[:error] = l(:no_time_tracker_running)
unless request.xhr?
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
query_from_id
time_bookings_query
unless User.current.allowed_to_globally?(:tt_edit_bookings, {})
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method auth_values
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def auth_values
add_available_filter 'tt_start_date', :type => :date, :order => 2
add_available_filter 'tt_booking_issue', :type => :list, :order => 4, :values => Issue.visible.all.collect { |s| [s.subject, s.id.to_s] }
add_available_filter 'tt_booking_activity', :type => :list, :order => 4, :values => help.get_activities('').map { |s| [s.name, s.name] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"