fisharebest/webtrees

View on GitHub
app/Report/ReportHtmlFootnote.php

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Function getWidth has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function getWidth($renderer): array
    {
        // Setup the style name
        $renderer->setCurrentStyle('footnotenum');

Severity: Minor
Found in app/Report/ReportHtmlFootnote.php - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getWidth has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function getWidth($renderer): array
    {
        // Setup the style name
        $renderer->setCurrentStyle('footnotenum');

Severity: Major
Found in app/Report/ReportHtmlFootnote.php - About 2 hrs to fix

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                    foreach ($lines as $line) {
                        // Line width in points + a little margin
                        $lw = $renderer->getStringWidth($line);
                        // If the line has to be wrapped
                        if ($lw > $wrapWidthRemaining) {
    Severity: Major
    Found in app/Report/ReportHtmlFootnote.php and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
    app/Report/ReportHtmlText.php on lines 141..180

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 228.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status