fossasia/knittingpattern

View on GitHub
knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage
A
100%

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method test_disconnected_from. (14)
Open

    def test_disconnected_from(self, connections, meshes):
        """Test all the meshes that are disconnected from each other."""
        for m1 in meshes:
            assert m1 == m1
            for m2 in meshes:

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function test_remove_a_connection. (10)
Open

def test_remove_a_connection(row1, row2, mesh11p, mesh21c, disconnect):
    disconnect_meshes(mesh11p, mesh21c, disconnect)
    assert mesh11p.is_produced()
    assert not mesh11p.is_consumed()
    assert mesh11p.producing_row == row1

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function test_replace_a_connection. (8)
Open

def test_replace_a_connection(disconnect, connect, mesh21p, mesh31c, mesh12p,

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function test_create_new_connection. (7)
Open

def test_create_new_connection(mesh31p, mesh12c, connect, row1, row3):

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function test_disconnected_from has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def test_disconnected_from(self, connections, meshes):
        """Test all the meshes that are disconnected from each other."""
        for m1 in meshes:
            assert m1 == m1
            for m2 in meshes:
Severity: Minor
Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method test_produced_meshes_of_row1. (6)
Open

    def test_produced_meshes_of_row1(self, row1, mesh11p, mesh12p):

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function test_replace_a_connection has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def test_replace_a_connection(disconnect, connect, mesh21p, mesh31c, mesh12p,
Severity: Major
Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py - About 50 mins to fix

    Function test_connect_to_a_connected_location_with_connected_mesh has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def test_connect_to_a_connected_location_with_connected_mesh(
    Severity: Minor
    Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Function test_create_new_connection has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def test_create_new_connection(mesh31p, mesh12c, connect, row1, row3):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py - About 35 mins to fix

        Function test_remove_a_connection has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def test_remove_a_connection(row1, row2, mesh11p, mesh21c, disconnect):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def test_consumed_mesh_of_row2(self, row2, mesh21c):
                  assert mesh21c.is_consumed()
                  assert mesh21c.is_produced()
                  assert mesh21c.consuming_row == row2
          Severity: Minor
          Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py and 2 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 151..154
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 156..159

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def test_consumed_mesh_of_row3(self, row3, mesh31c):
                  assert mesh31c.is_consumed()
                  assert mesh31c.is_produced()
                  assert mesh31c.consuming_row == row3
          Severity: Minor
          Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py and 2 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 146..149
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 151..154

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def test_produced_mesh_of_row2(self, row2, mesh21p):
                  assert mesh21p.is_consumed()
                  assert mesh21p.is_produced()
                  assert mesh21p.producing_row == row2
          Severity: Minor
          Found in knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py and 2 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 146..149
          knittingpattern/test/test_change_row_mapping.py on lines 156..159

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status