Showing 9 of 443 total issues
Method encode has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode vec, type: encoding_type
case type
when :most_similar
simils = similarities vec
code = simils.max_indexMethod initialize_distribution has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_distribution mu_init: 0, sigma_init: 1
@mu = case mu_init
when Range # initialize with random in range
raise ArgumentError, "mu_init: `Range` start/end in `Float`s" \
unless mu_init.first.kind_of?(Float) && mu_init.last.kind_of?(Float)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode vec, type: encoding_type
case type
when :most_similar
simils = similarities vec
code = simils.max_index- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sorted_inds_lst has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sorted_inds_lst
# Build samples and inds from the list of blocks
samples_lst, inds_lst = blocks.map do |xnes|
samples = xnes.standard_normal_samples
inds = xnes.move_inds(samples)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sorted_inds has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sorted_inds
# Xumo::NArray implements the Box-Muller, but no random seed (yet)
samples = standard_normal_samples
# samples = NArray.new([popsize, ndims]).rand_norm(0,1)
inds = move_inds(samples)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize ndims, obj_fn, opt_type, rseed: nil, mu_init: 0, sigma_init: 1, parallel_fit: false, rescale_popsize: 1, rescale_lrate: 1, utilities: nil, popsize: nil, lrate: nil
raise ArgumentError, "opt_type: #{opt_type}" unless [:min, :max].include? opt_type
raise ArgumentError, "obj_fn not callable: #{obj_fn}" unless obj_fn.respond_to? :call
raise ArgumentError, "utilities only if popsize" if utilities && popsize.nil?
raise ArgumentError, "wrong sizes" if utilities && utilities.size != popsize- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize_distribution has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_distribution mu_init: 0, sigma_init: 1
@mu = case mu_init
when Range # initialize with random in range
raise ArgumentError, "mu_init: `Range` start/end in `Float`s" \
unless mu_init.first.kind_of?(Float) && mu_init.last.kind_of?(Float)Method initialize_distribution has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_distribution mu_init: 0, sigma_init: 1
@mu = case mu_init
when Array
raise ArgumentError unless mu_init.size == ndims
NArray[mu_init]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize ncentrs:, dims:, vrange:, lrate:, simil_type: nil, encoding_type: nil, init_centr_vrange: nil, rseed: Random.new_seed
@rng = Random.new rseed # TODO: RNG CURRENTLY NOT USED!!
@dims = Array(dims)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"