Showing 9 of 72 total issues
Method weight_logs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def weight_logs(start_date: nil, end_date: nil, period: nil)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'start_date not specified.' unless start_date
if period && end_date
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'both end_date and period specified. please provide only one.'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intraday_activity_time_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intraday_activity_time_series(resource: nil, start_date: nil, end_date: nil, detail_level: nil,
start_time: nil, end_time: nil)
# converting to symbol to allow developer to use either 'calories' or :calories
resource = resource.to_sym
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method body_time_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def body_time_series(resource: nil, start_date: nil, end_date: nil, period: nil)
unless resource && start_date
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'resource and start_date are required parameters. Please specify both.'
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intraday_activity_time_series
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intraday_activity_time_series(resource: nil, start_date: nil, end_date: nil, detail_level: nil,
start_time: nil, end_time: nil)
# converting to symbol to allow developer to use either 'calories' or :calories
resource = resource.to_sym
Method activity_time_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def activity_time_series(resource: nil, start_date: nil, end_date: nil, period: nil)
unless resource && ACTIVITY_RESOURCES.include?(resource)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, "Invalid resource: #{resource}. Valid resources are #{ACTIVITY_RESOURCES}."
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sleep_time_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sleep_time_series(resource: nil, start_date: nil, end_date: nil, period: nil)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'Start date not provided.' unless start_date
unless resource && SLEEP_RESOURCES.include?(resource)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, "Invalid resource: #{resource}. Valid resources are #{SLEEP_RESOURCES}."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intraday_series_guard
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intraday_series_guard(start_date:, end_date:, detail_level:, start_time:, end_time:)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'Start date not provided.' unless start_date
unless detail_level && HR_DETAIL_LEVELS.include?(detail_level)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, "Please specify the defail level. Detail level should be one of #{HR_DETAIL_LEVELS}."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method body_fat_logs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def body_fat_logs(start_date: nil, end_date: nil, period: nil)
raise FitgemOauth2::InvalidArgumentError, 'must specify start_date' unless start_date
url = ['user', user_id, 'body/log/fat/date', format_date(start_date)].join('/')
url = [url, format_date(end_date)].join('/') if end_date
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format_date
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_date(date)
return nil if date.nil?
valid_semantic_date = %w[today yesterday].include? date
valid_date_string = (date =~ /\d{4}\-\d{2}\-\d{2}/) == 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"