Showing 2 of 2 total issues
Method end_markup has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def end_markup(name)
@context.pop
@sequence << (notranslate? ? (name == :span ? end_span : :text) : :markup)
@indicies << @pos - 1 unless @pos == @source.bytesize
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method attr has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def attr(name, value)
return unless @context.last == :span
return unless name == :class && value == "notranslate"
return if notranslate?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"