hackedteam/rcs-common

View on GitHub

Showing 90 of 90 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def aes_encrypt(clear_text, key, padding=PAD_PKCS5)
    cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.new('aes-128-cbc')
    cipher.encrypt
    cipher.padding = padding
    cipher.key = key
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rcs-common/crypt.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
lib/rcs-common/crypt.rb on lines 28..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def aes_decrypt(enc_text, key, padding=PAD_PKCS5)
    decipher = OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.new('aes-128-cbc')
    decipher.decrypt
    decipher.padding = padding
    decipher.key = key
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rcs-common/crypt.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
lib/rcs-common/crypt.rb on lines 17..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

        return false
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rcs-common/updater/server.rb - About 30 mins to fix

    Method decode_additional_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def decode_additional_header(data)
        raise EvidenceDeserializeError.new("incomplete CHAT MultiMedia") if data.nil? or data.bytesize == 0
    
        stream = StringIO.new data
        info = decode_from_to({}, stream)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def initialize(name = DEFAULT_NAME, options = {})
              @name                 = name.to_s.downcase.strip
              @name                 = DEFAULT_NAME if @name.empty?
              @mongoid_session_name = options[:mongoid_session_name] || :default
              @setup_on_write       = options[:lazy].nil? ? true : options[:lazy]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/gridfs.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method private_ipv4? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def private_ipv4?
            a,b,c,d = remote_addr.split(".").map(&:to_i)
            return true if a==127 && b==0 && c==0 && d==1 # localhost
            return true if a==192 && b==168 && c.between?(0,255) && d.between?(0,255) # 192.168.0.0/16
            return true if a==172 && b.between?(16,31) && c.between?(0,255) && d.between?(0,255) # 172.16.0.0/12
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/updater/server.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method mirror has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def mirror(local_folder, remote_folder, opts = {})
            opts[:trap] = true
            result = mirror!(local_folder, remote_folder, opts)
            changes = result.split("\n")[1..-3].reject { |x| x.empty? }
            changed = changes.size > 0 && changes != ["./"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/deploy.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method filesystem_stat_path has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def self.filesystem_stat_path
          return @@filesystem_stat_path if @@filesystem_stat_path
    
          pwd = Dir.pwd
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/systemstatus.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method decode_query has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def decode_query(url)
        query = []
        query = url.scan(/(?:&?|^)q=([^&]*)(?:&|$)/).first if url['google']
        query = url.scan(/(?:&?|^)p=([^&]*)(?:&|$)/).first if url['yahoo']
        query = url.scan(/(?:&?|^)q=([^&]*)(?:&|$)/).first if url['bing']
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method decode_from_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def decode_from_to(common_info, stream)
        tm = stream.read 36
        info = Hash[common_info]
        info[:da] = Time.gm(*(tm.unpack('L*')), 0)
        info[:data] = Hash.new if info[:data].nil?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method read_utf16le_string has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def read_utf16le_string
        # at least the null terminator
        return '' if self.size < 2
    
        # empty string by default
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/utf16le.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def decode_content(common_info, chunks)
        info = Hash[common_info]
        info[:data] = Hash.new if info[:data].nil?
        info[:data][:content] = chunks.join.utf16le_to_utf8
        yield info if block_given?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/device.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/info.rb on lines 15..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 29.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def decode_content(common_info, chunks)
        info = Hash[common_info]
        info[:data] = Hash.new if info[:data].nil?
        info[:data][:content] = chunks.first.utf16le_to_utf8
        yield info if block_given?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/info.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/device.rb on lines 14..19

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 29.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def content
          path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'content', 'mouse', '00' + (rand(4) + 1).to_s + '.jpg')
          File.open(path, 'rb') {|f| f.read }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/mouse.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 140..142
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/photo.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/screenshot.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 85..87

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def content
        path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'content', 'url', '00' + (rand(3) + 1).to_s + '.jpg')
        File.open(path, 'rb') {|f| f.read }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 140..142
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/mouse.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/photo.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/screenshot.rb on lines 9..11

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def content
        path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'content', 'screenshot', '00' + (rand(3) + 1).to_s + '.jpg')
        File.open(path, 'rb') {|f| f.read }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/photo.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 140..142
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/mouse.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/screenshot.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 85..87

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def content
        path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'content', 'screenshot', '00' + (rand(3) + 1).to_s + '.jpg')
        File.open(path, 'rb') {|f| f.read }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/screenshot.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 140..142
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/mouse.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/photo.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 85..87

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def content
        path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'content', 'screenshot', '00' + (rand(3) + 1).to_s + '.jpg')
        File.open(path, 'rb') {|f| f.read }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/mouse.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/photo.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/screenshot.rb on lines 9..11
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 85..87

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

         header.write [t.sec, t.min, t.hour, t.mday, t.mon, t.year, t.wday, t.yday, t.isdst ? 0 : 1].pack('l*')
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb and 7 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/application.rb on lines 15..15
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 88..88
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 212..212
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/clibpoard.rb on lines 14..14
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/file.rb on lines 22..22
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/keylog.rb on lines 19..19
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 31..31

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        content.write [t.sec, t.min, t.hour, t.mday, t.mon, t.year, t.wday, t.yday, t.isdst ? 0 : 1].pack('l*')
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/rcs-common/evidence/keylog.rb and 7 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/application.rb on lines 15..15
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 88..88
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 160..160
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/chat.rb on lines 212..212
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/clibpoard.rb on lines 14..14
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/file.rb on lines 22..22
    lib/rcs-common/evidence/url.rb on lines 31..31

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language