Sign upLogin

holgern/beem

View on GitHub
Star
beem/block.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage
C
76%

File block.py has 368 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, date
import json
from .exceptions import BlockDoesNotExistsException
from .utils import parse_time, formatTimeString
Severity: Minor
Found in beem/block.py - About 4 hrs to fix

    Function refresh has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def refresh(self):
        """ Even though blocks never change, you freshly obtain its contents
            from an API with this method
        """
        if self.identifier is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 4 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method refresh. (14)
    Open

        def refresh(self):
        """ Even though blocks never change, you freshly obtain its contents
            from an API with this method
        """
        if self.identifier is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _parse_json_data. (12)
    Open

        def _parse_json_data(self, block):
        parse_times = [
            "timestamp",
        ]
        for p in parse_times:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method json. (12)
    Open

        def json(self):
        output = self.copy()
        parse_times = [
            "timestamp",
        ]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function json has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def json(self):
        output = self.copy()
        parse_times = [
            "timestamp",
        ]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function json_operations has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def json_operations(self):
        """Returns all block operations as list, all dates are strings."""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return self["operations"]
        ops = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method json_operations. (9)
    Open

        @property
    def json_operations(self):
        """Returns all block operations as list, all dates are strings."""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return self["operations"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method ops_statistics. (9)
    Open

        def ops_statistics(self, add_to_ops_stat=None):
        """Returns a statistic with the occurrence of the different operation types"""
        if add_to_ops_stat is None:
            import beembase.operationids
            ops_stat = beembase.operationids.operations.copy()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method operations. (8)
    Open

        @property
    def operations(self):
        """Returns all block operations as list"""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return self["operations"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function _parse_json_data has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _parse_json_data(self, block):
        parse_times = [
            "timestamp",
        ]
        for p in parse_times:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Blocks. (7)
    Open

    class Blocks(list):
    """ Obtain a list of blocks

        :param list name_list: list of accounts to fetch
        :param int count: (optional) maximum number of accounts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method json_transactions. (7)
    Open

        @property
    def json_transactions(self):
        """ Returns all transactions as list, all dates are strings."""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return list()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (7)
    Open

        def __init__(self, starting_block_num, count=1000, lazy=False, full=True, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
        
        if blockchain_instance is None:
            if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Block. (7)
    Open

    class Block(BlockchainObject):
    """ Read a single block from the chain

        :param int block: block number
        :param Steem steem_instance: Steem
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method refresh. (6)
    Open

        def refresh(self):
        """ Even though blocks never change, you freshly obtain its contents
            from an API with this method
        """
        if not self.blockchain.is_connected():
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function ops_statistics has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def ops_statistics(self, add_to_ops_stat=None):
        """Returns a statistic with the occurrence of the different operation types"""
        if add_to_ops_stat is None:
            import beembase.operationids
            ops_stat = beembase.operationids.operations.copy()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function operations has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def operations(self):
        """Returns all block operations as list"""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return self["operations"]
        ops = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/block.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __init__ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(
    Severity: Major
    Found in beem/block.py - About 50 mins to fix

      Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, starting_block_num, count=1000, lazy=False, full=True, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/block.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Function json_transactions has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def json_transactions(self):
        """ Returns all transactions as list, all dates are strings."""
        if self.only_ops or self.only_virtual_ops:
            return list()
        trxs = []
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/block.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/block.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Function json has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def json(self):
        output = self.copy()
        parse_times = [
            "timestamp",
        ]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/block.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function refresh has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def refresh(self):
        """ Even though blocks never change, you freshly obtain its contents
            from an API with this method
        """
        if not self.blockchain.is_connected():
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/block.py - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def __init__(self, starting_block_num, count=1000, lazy=False, full=True, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
        
        if blockchain_instance is None:
            if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/block.py - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method "__init__" has 8 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized.
          Open

                  self,
        block,
        only_ops=False,
        only_virtual_ops=False,
        full=True,
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py by sonar-python

          A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

          Noncompliant Code Example

          With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

          def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
    ...

          Compliant Solution

          def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
    ...

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 21 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def json(self):
          Severity: Critical
          Found in beem/block.py by sonar-python

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 29 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def refresh(self):
          Severity: Critical
          Found in beem/block.py by sonar-python

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 18 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def _parse_json_data(self, block):
          Severity: Critical
          Found in beem/block.py by sonar-python

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 19 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def json_operations(self):
          Severity: Critical
          Found in beem/block.py by sonar-python

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "transactions" in output:
            for i in range(len(output["transactions"])):
                if 'expiration' in output["transactions"][i] and isinstance(output["transactions"][i]["expiration"], (datetime, date)):
                    output["transactions"][i]["expiration"] = formatTimeString(output["transactions"][i]["expiration"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 114..117

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 118.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  elif "operations" in output:
            for i in range(len(output["operations"])):
                if 'timestamp' in output["operations"][i] and isinstance(output["operations"][i]["timestamp"], (datetime, date)):
                    output["operations"][i]["timestamp"] = formatTimeString(output["operations"][i]["timestamp"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 110..113

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 118.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "transactions" in block:
            for i in range(len(block["transactions"])):
                if 'expiration' in block["transactions"][i] and isinstance(block["transactions"][i]["expiration"], string_types):
                    block["transactions"][i]["expiration"] = formatTimeString(block["transactions"][i]["expiration"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 91..94

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 115.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  elif "operations" in block:
            for i in range(len(block["operations"])):
                if 'timestamp' in block["operations"][i] and isinstance(block["operations"][i]["timestamp"], string_types):
                    block["operations"][i]["timestamp"] = formatTimeString(block["operations"][i]["timestamp"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 87..90

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 115.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  for p in parse_times:
            if p in output:
                p_date = output.get(p, datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0))
                if isinstance(p_date, (datetime, date)):
                    output[p] = formatTimeString(p_date)
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 4 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 102..108
          beem/comment.py on lines 203..209
          beem/vote.py on lines 153..159
          beem/witness.py on lines 96..102

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 75.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  for p in parse_times:
            if p in output:
                p_date = output.get(p, datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0))
                if isinstance(p_date, (datetime, date)):
                    output[p] = formatTimeString(p_date)
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 4 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 379..385
          beem/comment.py on lines 203..209
          beem/vote.py on lines 153..159
          beem/witness.py on lines 96..102

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 75.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if 'expiration' in trx:
                p_date = trx.get('expiration', datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0))
                if isinstance(p_date, (datetime, date)):
                    trx_new.update({'expiration': formatTimeString(p_date)})
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 259..262

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 59.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if 'timestamp' in op:
                    p_date = op.get('timestamp', datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0))
                    if isinstance(p_date, (datetime, date)):
                        op_new.update({'timestamp': formatTimeString(p_date)})
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/block.py on lines 234..237

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 59.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  for p in parse_times:
            if p in block and isinstance(block.get(p), string_types):
                block[p] = formatTimeString(block.get(p, "1970-01-01T00:00:00"))
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 7 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/account.py on lines 164..166
          beem/block.py on lines 369..371
          beem/comment.py on lines 88..90
          beem/comment.py on lines 129..131
          beem/vote.py on lines 130..132
          beem/witness.py on lines 80..82
          beem/witness.py on lines 86..88

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 54.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  for p in parse_times:
            if p in block and isinstance(block.get(p), string_types):
                block[p] = formatTimeString(block.get(p, "1970-01-01T00:00:00"))
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 7 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/account.py on lines 164..166
          beem/block.py on lines 84..86
          beem/comment.py on lines 88..90
          beem/comment.py on lines 129..131
          beem/vote.py on lines 130..132
          beem/witness.py on lines 80..82
          beem/witness.py on lines 86..88

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 54.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if add_to_ops_stat is None:
            import beembase.operationids
            ops_stat = beembase.operationids.operations.copy()
            for key in ops_stat:
                ops_stat[key] = 0
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/blockchain.py on lines 639..645

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 53.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                              if len(op_type) > 10 and op_type[len(op_type) - 10:] == "_operation":
                        op_type = op_type[:-10]
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 4 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/account.py on lines 2166..2167
          beem/blockchain.py on lines 742..743
          beem/blockchain.py on lines 751..752
          beem/blockchain.py on lines 816..817

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 52.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  super(Blocks, self).__init__(
            [
                Block(x, lazy=lazy, full=full, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/block.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/account.py on lines 3890..3892
          beem/community.py on lines 460..462
          beem/witness.py on lines 319..321
          beem/witness.py on lines 412..414
          beem/witness.py on lines 519..521

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 38.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if block is not None and "header" in block:
                block = block["header"]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/block.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          beem/comment.py on lines 171..172

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 32.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status