# holgern/beem

beem/blurt.py

### Summary

F
2 wks
F
51%

#### File `blurt.py` has 352 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import json
import logging
import re
import os``````
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 4 hrs to fix

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method rshares_to_vote_pct. (15) Open

``````    def rshares_to_vote_pct(self, rshares, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the voting percentage for a desired rshares value
for a given Steem Power or vesting shares and voting_power
Give either steem_power or vests, not both.
When the output is greater than 10000 or less than -10000,``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### `Blurt` has 26 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````class Blurt(BlockChainInstance):
""" Connect to the Blurt network.

:param str node: Node to connect to *(optional)*
:param str rpcuser: RPC user *(optional)*``````
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 3 hrs to fix

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_blurt_per_mvest. (6) Open

``````    def get_blurt_per_mvest(self, time_stamp=None, use_stored_data=True):
""" Returns the MVEST to BLURT ratio

:param int time_stamp: (optional) if set, return an estimated
BLURT per MVEST ratio for the given time stamp. If unset the``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method bbd_to_rshares. (6) Open

``````    def bbd_to_rshares(self, sbd, not_broadcasted_vote=False, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the r-shares from SBD

:param sbd: SBD
:type sbd: str, int, amount.Amount``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Function `rshares_to_vote_pct` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def rshares_to_vote_pct(self, rshares, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the voting percentage for a desired rshares value
for a given Steem Power or vesting shares and voting_power
Give either steem_power or vests, not both.
When the output is greater than 10000 or less than -10000,``````
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 55 mins to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Function `bbd_to_vote_pct` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def bbd_to_vote_pct(self, sbd, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 50 mins to fix

#### Function `bp_to_bbd` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def bp_to_bbd(self, sp, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

#### Function `rshares_to_vote_pct` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def rshares_to_vote_pct(self, rshares, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

#### Function `get_blurt_per_mvest` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def get_blurt_per_mvest(self, time_stamp=None, use_stored_data=True):
""" Returns the MVEST to BLURT ratio

:param int time_stamp: (optional) if set, return an estimated
BLURT per MVEST ratio for the given time stamp. If unset the``````
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Function `token_power_to_token_backed_dollar` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def token_power_to_token_backed_dollar(self, token_power, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

#### Function `vests_to_bbd` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def vests_to_bbd(self, vests, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

#### Function `vests_to_rshares` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def vests_to_rshares(self, vests, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, subtract_dust_threshold=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 45 mins to fix

#### Function `bp_to_rshares` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``    def bp_to_rshares(self, steem_power, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 35 mins to fix

#### Function `bbd_to_rshares` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bbd_to_rshares(self, sbd, not_broadcasted_vote=False, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the r-shares from SBD

:param sbd: SBD
:type sbd: str, int, amount.Amount``````
Found in beem/blurt.py - About 25 mins to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Method "bbd_to_vote_pct" has 8 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized. Open

``    def bbd_to_vote_pct(self, sbd, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):``
Found in beem/blurt.py by sonar-python

A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

## Noncompliant Code Example

With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

```def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
...
```

## Compliant Solution

```def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
...
```

#### Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "399" or change one of the implementations. Open

``            sbd = Amount(sbd, blockchain_instance=self)``
Found in beem/blurt.py by sonar-python

Having two branches in the same `if` structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

## Noncompliant Code Example

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
```

## Compliant Solution

```if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4
```

or

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_third_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
```

#### Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "304" or change one of the implementations. Open

``            sbd = Amount(sbd, blockchain_instance=self)``
Found in beem/blurt.py by sonar-python

Having two branches in the same `if` structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

## Noncompliant Code Example

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
```

## Compliant Solution

```if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4
```

or

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_third_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
```

#### Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "364" or change one of the implementations. Open

``            rshares = math.copysign(self._calc_revert_vote_claim(abs(rshares), post_rshares), rshares)``
Found in beem/blurt.py by sonar-python

Having two branches in the same `if` structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

## Noncompliant Code Example

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
```

## Compliant Solution

```if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 4
```

or

```if 0 <= a < 10:
do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
do_the_third_thing()
else:
do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
```

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def rshares_to_vote_pct(self, rshares, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the voting percentage for a desired rshares value
for a given Steem Power or vesting shares and voting_power
Give either steem_power or vests, not both.
When the output is greater than 10000 or less than -10000,``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 4 days to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 329..369
beem/steem.py on lines 348..388

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 433.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bbd_to_rshares(self, sbd, not_broadcasted_vote=False, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the r-shares from SBD

:param sbd: SBD
:type sbd: str, int, amount.Amount``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 2 days to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 284..327
beem/steem.py on lines 303..346

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 275.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def get_blurt_per_mvest(self, time_stamp=None, use_stored_data=True):
""" Returns the MVEST to BLURT ratio

:param int time_stamp: (optional) if set, return an estimated
BLURT per MVEST ratio for the given time stamp. If unset the``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 162..187

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 214.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bbd_to_vote_pct(self, sbd, post_rshares=0, steem_power=None, vests=None, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the voting percentage for a desired SBD value
for a given Steem Power or vesting shares and voting power
Give either Steem Power or vests, not both.
When the output is greater than 10000 or smaller than -10000,``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 371..398
beem/steem.py on lines 390..417

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 151.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def vests_to_rshares(self, vests, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, subtract_dust_threshold=True, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the r-shares from vests

:param number vests: vesting shares
:param int post_rshares: rshares of post which is voted``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 265..282
beem/steem.py on lines 284..301

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 140.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    @property
def hardfork(self):
if self.offline or self.rpc is None:
versions = known_chains['BLURT']['min_version']
else:``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 3 other locations - About 6 hrs to fix
beem/blockchaininstance.py on lines 753..763
beem/hive.py on lines 407..417
beem/steem.py on lines 426..436

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 104.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def _calc_resulting_vote(self, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):
# determine voting power used
used_power = int((voting_power * abs(vote_pct)) / STEEM_100_PERCENT * (60 * 60 * 24))
max_vote_denom = self._max_vote_denom(use_stored_data=use_stored_data)
used_power = int((used_power + max_vote_denom - 1) / max_vote_denom)``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 6 hrs to fix
beem/blockchaininstance.py on lines 604..609
beem/steem.py on lines 264..269

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 99.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def get_network(self, use_stored_data=True, config=None):
""" Identify the network

:param bool use_stored_data: if True, stored data will be returned. If stored data are
empty or old, refresh_data() is used.``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 5 hrs to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 114..132
beem/steem.py on lines 112..130

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 86.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bp_to_bbd(self, sp, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the resulting equivalent BBD vote value from Blurt power

:param number steem_power: Blurt Power
:param int post_rshares: rshares of post which is voted``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 221..234
beem/steem.py on lines 227..240

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 65.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def vests_to_bp(self, vests, timestamp=None, use_stored_data=True):
""" Converts vests to BP

:param amount.Amount vests/float vests: Vests to convert
:param int timestamp: (Optional) Can be used to calculate``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 191..201
beem/steem.py on lines 194..204

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bp_to_rshares(self, steem_power, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the r-shares from Steem power

:param number steem_power: Steem Power
:param int post_rshares: rshares of post which is voted``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
beem/steem.py on lines 271..282

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 60.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def vests_to_bbd(self, vests, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):
""" Obtain the resulting BBD vote value from vests

:param number vests: vesting shares
:param int post_rshares: rshares of post which is voted``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 236..249
beem/steem.py on lines 242..255

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def rshares_to_bbd(self, rshares, not_broadcasted_vote=False, use_stored_data=True):
""" Calculates the current SBD value of a vote
"""
payout = float(rshares) * self.get_bbd_per_rshares(use_stored_data=use_stored_data,
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 137..142
beem/steem.py on lines 135..140

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def _max_vote_denom(self, use_stored_data=True):
# get props
global_properties = self.get_dynamic_global_properties(use_stored_data=use_stored_data)
vote_power_reserve_rate = global_properties['vote_power_reserve_rate']
max_vote_denom = vote_power_reserve_rate * STEEM_VOTE_REGENERATION_SECONDS``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
beem/blockchaininstance.py on lines 597..602
beem/steem.py on lines 257..262

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 47.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    @property
def chain_params(self):
if self.offline or self.rpc is None:
return known_chains["BLURT"]
else:``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
beem/blockchaininstance.py on lines 746..751
beem/hive.py on lines 400..405
beem/steem.py on lines 419..424

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    @property
def is_blurt(self):
config = self.get_config()
if config is None:
return True``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 419..424
beem/steem.py on lines 438..443

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 43.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def token_power_to_token_backed_dollar(self, token_power, post_rshares=0, voting_power=STEEM_100_PERCENT, vote_pct=STEEM_100_PERCENT, not_broadcasted_vote=True, use_stored_data=True):
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 218..219
beem/steem.py on lines 224..225

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 43.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def bp_to_vests(self, sp, timestamp=None, use_stored_data=True):
""" Converts BP to vests

:param float bp: Blurt power to convert
:param datetime timestamp: (Optional) Can be used to calculate``````
Found in beem/blurt.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
beem/hive.py on lines 206..213
beem/steem.py on lines 206..213

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.