holgern/beem

View on GitHub
beem/discussions.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 mo
Test Coverage
F
44%

File discussions.py has 886 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from .instance import shared_blockchain_instance
from .account import Account
from .comment import Comment
from .utils import resolve_authorperm
Severity: Major
Found in beem/discussions.py - About 2 days to fix

    Function get_discussions has a Cognitive Complexity of 78 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def get_discussions(self, discussion_type, discussion_query, limit=1000, raw_data=False):
            """ Get Discussions
    
                :param str discussion_type: Defines the used discussion query
                :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_discussions. (48)
    Open

        def get_discussions(self, discussion_type, discussion_query, limit=1000, raw_data=False):
            """ Get Discussions
    
                :param str discussion_type: Defines the used discussion query
                :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions. (27)
    Open

    class Discussions(object):
        """ Get Discussions
    
            :param Steem blockchain_instance: Steem instance
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_trending. (15)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_trending(list):
        """ Get Discussions by trending
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Replies_by_last_update. (15)
    Open

    class Replies_by_last_update(list):
        """ Returns a list of replies by last update
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts start_parent_author and start_permlink must be set.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (15)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (15)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_comments. (15)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_comments(list):
        """ Get discussions by comments
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts, start_author and start_permlink must be set.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (15)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_votes. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_votes(list):
        """ Get discussions_by_votes
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_hot. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_hot(list):
        """ Get discussions by hot
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_promoted. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_promoted(list):
        """ Get discussions by promoted
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_blog. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_blog(list):
        """ Get discussions by blog
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts, tag musst be set to a username
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_active. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_active(list):
        """ get_discussions_by_active
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_children. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_children(list):
        """ Get discussions by children
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_created. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_created(list):
        """ Get discussions_by_created
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Comment_discussions_by_payout. (14)
    Open

    class Comment_discussions_by_payout(list):
        """ Get comment_discussions_by_payout
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_feed. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_feed(list):
        """ Get discussions by feed
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts, tag musst be set to a username
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Post_discussions_by_payout. (14)
    Open

    class Post_discussions_by_payout(list):
        """ Get post_discussions_by_payout
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                searching posts
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_cashout. (14)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_cashout(list):
        """ Get discussions_by_cashout. This query seems to be broken at the moment.
            The output is always empty.
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Discussions_by_author_before_date. (12)
    Open

    class Discussions_by_author_before_date(list):
        """ Get Discussions by author before date
    
            .. note:: To retrieve discussions before date, the time of creation
                      of the discussion @author/start_permlink must be older than
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (12)
    Open

        def __init__(self, author="", start_permlink="", before_date="1970-01-01T00:00:00", limit=100, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (10)
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Trending_tags. (10)
    Open

    class Trending_tags(list):
        """ Returns the list of trending tags.
    
            :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                searching posts, start_tag can be set.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            if blockchain_instance is None:
                if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                    blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __init__ has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, limit=0, tag="", truncate_body=0,
    Severity: Major
    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              if blockchain_instance is None:
                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, author="", start_permlink="", before_date="1970-01-01T00:00:00", limit=100, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(self, author="", start_permlink="", before_date="1970-01-01T00:00:00", limit=100, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                if blockchain_instance is None:
                    if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                        blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                    elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/discussions.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

          Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

            Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
            Severity: Minor
            Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

              Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
              Severity: Minor
              Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                Severity: Minor
                Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                  Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                    Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                        def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                      Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                        Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                          Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                            Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                            Open

                                def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                            Severity: Minor
                            Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                              Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                  def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                    def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                  Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                                  Open

                                                          if len(dd) == 1:
                                                              found_more_than_start_entry = False
                                                      start_parent_author = d["author"]
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                                    Open

                                                            if len(dd) == 1:
                                                                found_more_than_start_entry = False
                                                        start_author = d["author"]
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                      Open

                                          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                              if blockchain_instance is None:
                                                  if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                                                      blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
                                                  elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
                                      Severity: Minor
                                      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                      Cognitive Complexity

                                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                                      Further reading

                                      Function __init__ has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                      Open

                                          def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                      Severity: Minor
                                      Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                                        Open

                                                                if len(dd) == 1:
                                                                    found_more_than_start_entry = False
                                                            start_tag = d["name"]
                                        Severity: Major
                                        Found in beem/discussions.py - About 45 mins to fix

                                          Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                          Open

                                              def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                          Severity: Minor
                                          Found in beem/discussions.py - About 35 mins to fix

                                            Method "__init__" has 15 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized.
                                            Open

                                                def __init__(self, limit=0, tag="", truncate_body=0,
                                                             filter_tags=[], select_authors=[], select_tags=[],
                                                             start_author=None, start_permlink=None,
                                                             start_tag=None, parent_author=None,
                                                             parent_permlink=None, start_parent_author=None,
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

                                            Noncompliant Code Example

                                            With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

                                            def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
                                                ...
                                            

                                            Compliant Solution

                                            def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
                                                ...
                                            

                                            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 81 to the 15 allowed.
                                            Open

                                                def get_discussions(self, discussion_type, discussion_query, limit=1000, raw_data=False):
                                            Severity: Critical
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                                            See

                                            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 16 to the 15 allowed.
                                            Open

                                                def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                            Severity: Critical
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                                            See

                                            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 16 to the 15 allowed.
                                            Open

                                                def __init__(self, discussion_query, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                            Severity: Critical
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                                            See

                                            Method "__init__" has 10 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized.
                                            Open

                                                def __init__(self, author="", start_permlink="", before_date="1970-01-01T00:00:00", limit=100, lazy=False, use_appbase=False, raw_data=False, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.

                                            Noncompliant Code Example

                                            With a maximum number of 4 parameters:

                                            def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5):
                                                ...
                                            

                                            Compliant Solution

                                            def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4):
                                                ...
                                            

                                            Remove this commented out code.
                                            Open

                                                        # limit = discussion_query["limit"]
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

                                            Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

                                            See

                                            • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
                                            • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
                                            • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
                                            • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

                                            Remove this commented out code.
                                            Open

                                                        # limit = discussion_query["limit"]
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py by sonar-python

                                            Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

                                            Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

                                            See

                                            • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
                                            • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
                                            • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
                                            • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_votes(list):
                                                """ Get discussions_by_votes
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Post_discussions_by_payout(list):
                                                """ Get post_discussions_by_payout
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_children(list):
                                                """ Get discussions by children
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_hot(list):
                                                """ Get discussions by hot
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_active(list):
                                                """ get_discussions_by_active
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_cashout(list):
                                                """ Get discussions_by_cashout. This query seems to be broken at the moment.
                                                    The output is always empty.
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Comment_discussions_by_payout(list):
                                                """ Get comment_discussions_by_payout
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_created(list):
                                                """ Get discussions_by_created
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter for
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 870..915

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                            class Discussions_by_promoted(list):
                                                """ Get discussions by promoted
                                            
                                                    :param Query discussion_query: Defines the parameter
                                                        searching posts
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 8 other locations - About 2 days to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 296..341
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 347..392
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 398..443
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 449..494
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 500..546
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 552..597
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 603..648
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 654..699

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 301.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                                if query_count != 0 and rpc_query_count == 0 and (d["author"] == start_parent_author and d["permlink"] == start_permlink):
                                                                    double_result = True
                                                                    if len(dd) == 1:
                                                                        found_more_than_start_entry = False
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 179..182

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 75.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                                if query_count != 0 and rpc_query_count == 0 and (d["author"] == start_author and d["permlink"] == start_permlink):
                                                                    double_result = True
                                                                    if len(dd) == 1:
                                                                        found_more_than_start_entry = False
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 172..175

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 75.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                    if self.blockchain.rpc.get_use_appbase() and use_appbase:
                                                        posts = self.blockchain.rpc.get_discussions_by_comments(reduced_query, api="tags")
                                                        if 'discussions' in posts:
                                                            posts = posts['discussions']  # inconsistent format across node types
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 948..951

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 41.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                        try:
                                                            posts = self.blockchain.rpc.get_replies_by_last_update(discussion_query, api="tags")
                                                            if 'discussions' in posts:
                                                                posts = posts['discussions']
                                            Severity: Major
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 848..851

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 41.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                        except:
                                                            posts = self.blockchain.rpc.get_replies_by_last_update(discussion_query["start_author"], discussion_query["start_permlink"], discussion_query["limit"])
                                            Severity: Minor
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 954..955

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 35.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                    if len(posts) == 0:
                                                        posts = self.blockchain.rpc.get_replies_by_last_update(discussion_query["start_author"], discussion_query["start_permlink"], discussion_query["limit"])
                                            Severity: Minor
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                                            beem/discussions.py on lines 952..953

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 35.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                            Open

                                                    if len(posts) == 0:
                                                        tags = self.blockchain.rpc.get_trending_tags(discussion_query["start_tag"], discussion_query["limit"], api="tags")
                                            Severity: Minor
                                            Found in beem/discussions.py and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
                                            beem/vote.py on lines 386..387
                                            beem/vote.py on lines 383..395

                                            Duplicated Code

                                            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                            Tuning

                                            This issue has a mass of 32.

                                            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                            Refactorings

                                            Further Reading

                                            There are no issues that match your filters.

                                            Category
                                            Status