Sign upLogin

holgern/beem

View on GitHub
Star
beem/hivesigner.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage
F
46%

File hivesigner.py has 358 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import json
try:
    from urllib.parse import urlparse, urlencode, urljoin
except ImportError:
Severity: Minor
Found in beem/hivesigner.py - About 4 hrs to fix

    HiveSigner has 27 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class HiveSigner(object):
    """ HiveSigner

        :param str scope: comma separated string with scopes
            login,offline,vote,comment,delete_comment,comment_options,custom_json,claim_reward_balance
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/hivesigner.py - About 3 hrs to fix

      Function url_from_tx has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def url_from_tx(self, tx, redirect_uri=None):
        """ Creates a link for broadcasting an operation

            :param dict tx: includes the operation, which should be broadcast
            :param str redirect_uri: Redirects to this uri, when set
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py - About 3 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method url_from_tx. (12)
      Open

          def url_from_tx(self, tx, redirect_uri=None):
        """ Creates a link for broadcasting an operation

            :param dict tx: includes the operation, which should be broadcast
            :param str redirect_uri: Redirects to this uri, when set
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method create_hot_sign_url. (9)
      Open

          def create_hot_sign_url(self, operation, params, redirect_uri=None):
        """ Creates a link for broadcasting an operation

            :param str operation: operation name (e.g.: vote)
            :param dict params: operation dict params
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (8)
      Open

          def __init__(self, blockchain_instance=None, *args, **kwargs):
        if blockchain_instance is None:
            if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
            elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, blockchain_instance=None, *args, **kwargs):
        if blockchain_instance is None:
            if kwargs.get("steem_instance"):
                blockchain_instance = kwargs["steem_instance"]
            elif kwargs.get("hive_instance"):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function create_hot_sign_url has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def create_hot_sign_url(self, operation, params, redirect_uri=None):
        """ Creates a link for broadcasting an operation

            :param str operation: operation name (e.g.: vote)
            :param dict params: operation dict params
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 22 to the 15 allowed.
      Open

          def url_from_tx(self, tx, redirect_uri=None):
      Severity: Critical
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py by sonar-python

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

      See

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def getTokenForAccountName(self, name):
        """ Obtain the private token for a given public name

            :param str name: Public name
        """
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 224..231

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 44.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def unlocked(self):
        """ Is the wallet database unlocked?
        """
        unlocked = True
        if self.store.is_encrypted():
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 159..165

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 42.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def unlock(self, pwd):
        """ Unlock the wallet database
        """
        unlock_ok = None
        if self.store.is_encrypted():
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 143..149

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 41.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def lock(self):
        """ Lock the wallet database
        """
        lock_ok = False
        if self.store.is_encrypted():
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 151..157

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 38.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def newWallet(self, pwd):
        """ Create a new wallet database

            :param str pwd: Passphrase for the created wallet
        """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 196..203

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 36.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def locked(self):
        """ Is the wallet database locked?
        """
        if self.store.is_encrypted():
            return self.store.locked()
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/hivesigner.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      beem/wallet.py on lines 167..173

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 32.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status