# holgern/beem

beem/memo.py

### Summary

F
6 days
B
87%

#### File `memo.py` has 419 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from beem.instance import shared_blockchain_instance
import random
import os
import struct``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 6 hrs to fix

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method decrypt. (24) Open

``````    def decrypt(self, memo):
""" Decrypt a memo

:param str memo: encrypted memo message
:returns: encrypted memo``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method decrypt_binary. (24) Open

``````    def decrypt_binary(self, infile, outfile, buffer_size=2048):
""" Decrypt a binary file

:param str infile: encrypted binary file
:param str outfile: output file name``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Function `decrypt_binary` has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def decrypt_binary(self, infile, outfile, buffer_size=2048):
""" Decrypt a binary file

:param str infile: encrypted binary file
:param str outfile: output file name``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 4 hrs to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Function `decrypt` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def decrypt(self, memo):
""" Decrypt a memo

:param str memo: encrypted memo message
:returns: encrypted memo``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 3 hrs to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (13) Open

``````    def __init__(
self,
from_account=None,
to_account=None,
blockchain_instance=None,``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method encrypt_binary. (12) Open

``````    def encrypt_binary(self, infile, outfile, buffer_size=2048, nonce=None):
""" Encrypt a binary file

:param str infile: input file name
:param str outfile: output file name``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Memo. (12) Open

``````class Memo(object):
""" Deals with Memos that are attached to a transfer

:param Account from_account: Account that has sent the memo
:param Account to_account: Account that has received the memo``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method encrypt. (9) Open

``````    def encrypt(self, memo, bts_encrypt=False, return_enc_memo_only=False, nonce=None):
""" Encrypt a memo

:param str memo: clear text memo message
:param bool return_enc_memo_only: When True, only the encoded memo is returned``````

## Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

#### Function `__init__` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def __init__(
self,
from_account=None,
to_account=None,
blockchain_instance=None,``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 1 hr to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Function `encrypt_binary` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def encrypt_binary(self, infile, outfile, buffer_size=2048, nonce=None):
""" Encrypt a binary file

:param str infile: input file name
:param str outfile: output file name``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 1 hr to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Function `encrypt` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

``````    def encrypt(self, memo, bts_encrypt=False, return_enc_memo_only=False, nonce=None):
""" Encrypt a memo

:param str memo: clear text memo message
:param bool return_enc_memo_only: When True, only the encoded memo is returned``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 1 hr to fix

# Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

#### Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open

``````        if memo_to is None or memo_from is None:
from_key, to_key, nonce, check, cipher = BtsMemo.extract_memo_data(message)
try:
memo_wif = self.blockchain.wallet.getPrivateKeyForPublicKey(
str(to_key)``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 40 mins to fix

#### Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open

``````        if memo_to is None and memo_from is None:
try:
memo_wif = self.blockchain.wallet.getPrivateKeyForPublicKey(
str(to_key)
)``````
Found in beem/memo.py - About 40 mins to fix

#### Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 28 to the 15 allowed. Open

``    def decrypt(self, memo):``
Found in beem/memo.py by sonar-python

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

## See

#### Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 32 to the 15 allowed. Open

``    def decrypt_binary(self, infile, outfile, buffer_size=2048):``
Found in beem/memo.py by sonar-python

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

## See

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        elif memo_to is not None and memo_from is not None and isinstance(memo_to, PrivateKey):
memo_wif = memo_to
if isinstance(memo_from, Account):
pubkey = memo_from["memo_key"]
else:``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 346..367

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 106.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        elif memo_to is not None and memo_from is not None and isinstance(memo_to, PrivateKey):
memo_wif = memo_to
pubkey = memo_from
else:
try:``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 431..456

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 106.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        if memo_to is None and memo_from is None:
try:
memo_wif = self.blockchain.wallet.getPrivateKeyForPublicKey(
str(to_key)
)``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 325..342

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 86.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````            try:
memo_wif = self.blockchain.wallet.getPrivateKeyForPublicKey(
str(to_key)
)
pubkey = from_key``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 406..424

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 86.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        if from_account and len(from_account) < 51:
self.from_account = Account(from_account, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
elif from_account and len(from_account) >= 51:
self.from_account = PrivateKey(from_account)
else:``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 149..154

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        if to_account and len(to_account) < 51:
self.to_account = Account(to_account, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
elif to_account and len(to_account) >= 51:
self.to_account = PublicKey(to_account)
else:``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 155..160

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        if isinstance(self.to_account, Account):
pubkey = self.to_account["memo_key"]
else:
pubkey = self.to_account``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 252..255

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        if isinstance(self.to_account, Account):
pubkey = self.to_account["memo_key"]
else:
pubkey = self.to_account        ``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 187..190

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.

## Refactorings

#### Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

``````        elif memo_to is not None and memo_from is not None and isinstance(memo_from, PrivateKey):
memo_wif = memo_from
if isinstance(memo_to, Account):
pubkey = memo_to["memo_key"]
else:``````
Found in beem/memo.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
beem/memo.py on lines 431..436

## Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

## Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See `codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.