Sign upLogin

holgern/beem

View on GitHub
Star
beem/utils.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage
C
70%

File utils.py has 438 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import re
import json
import time as timenow
import math
Severity: Minor
Found in beem/utils.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function create_yaml_header. (19)
    Open

    def create_yaml_header(comment, json_metadata={}, reply_identifier=None):
    yaml_prefix = '---\n'
    if comment["title"] != "":
        yaml_prefix += 'title: "%s"\n' % comment["title"]
    if "permlink" in comment:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function derive_permlink has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def derive_permlink(title, parent_permlink=None, parent_author=None,
                    max_permlink_length=256, with_suffix=True):
    """Derive a permlink from a comment title (for root level
    comments) or the parent permlink and optionally the parent
    author (for replies).
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function import_custom_json. (15)
    Open

    def import_custom_json(jsonid, json_data):
    data = {}
    if isinstance(json_data, tuple) and len(json_data) > 1:
        key = None
        for j in json_data:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function import_custom_json has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def import_custom_json(jsonid, json_data):
    data = {}
    if isinstance(json_data, tuple) and len(json_data) > 1:
        key = None
        for j in json_data:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function create_yaml_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def create_yaml_header(comment, json_metadata={}, reply_identifier=None):
    yaml_prefix = '---\n'
    if comment["title"] != "":
        yaml_prefix += 'title: "%s"\n' % comment["title"]
    if "permlink" in comment:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function derive_beneficiaries. (11)
    Open

    def derive_beneficiaries(beneficiaries):
    beneficiaries_list = []
    beneficiaries_accounts = []
    beneficiaries_sum = 0
    if not isinstance(beneficiaries, list):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function derive_permlink. (11)
    Open

    def derive_permlink(title, parent_permlink=None, parent_author=None,
                    max_permlink_length=256, with_suffix=True):
    """Derive a permlink from a comment title (for root level
    comments) or the parent permlink and optionally the parent
    author (for replies).
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function derive_beneficiaries has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def derive_beneficiaries(beneficiaries):
    beneficiaries_list = []
    beneficiaries_accounts = []
    beneficiaries_sum = 0
    if not isinstance(beneficiaries, list):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function create_new_password. (9)
    Open

    def create_new_password(length=32):
    """Creates a random password containing alphanumeric chars with at least 1 number and 1 upper and lower char"""
    alphabet = string.ascii_letters + string.digits
    while True:
        import_password = ''.join(secrets.choice(alphabet) for i in range(length))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function remove_from_dict. (8)
    Open

    def remove_from_dict(obj, keys=list(), keep_keys=True):
    """ Prune a class or dictionary of all but keys (keep_keys=True).
        Prune a class or dictionary of specified keys.(keep_keys=False).
    """
    if type(obj) == dict:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function import_coldcard_wif. (8)
    Open

    def import_coldcard_wif(filename):
    """Reads a exported coldcard Wif text file and returns the WIF and used path"""
    next_var = ""
    import_password = ""
    path = ""
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function derive_tags. (6)
    Open

    def derive_tags(tags):
    tags_list = []
    if len(tags.split(",")) > 1:
        for tag in tags.split(","):
            tags_list.append(tag.strip())
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function import_coldcard_wif has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def import_coldcard_wif(filename):
    """Reads a exported coldcard Wif text file and returns the WIF and used path"""
    next_var = ""
    import_password = ""
    path = ""
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function derive_permlink has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def derive_permlink(title, parent_permlink=None, parent_author=None,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in beem/utils.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Function derive_tags has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def derive_tags(tags):
    tags_list = []
    if len(tags.split(",")) > 1:
        for tag in tags.split(","):
            tags_list.append(tag.strip())
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/utils.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function construct_authorpermvoter has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def construct_authorpermvoter(*args):
    """ Create a vote identifier from vote object or arguments.
    Examples:

        .. code-block:: python
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/utils.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

                  return suffix[1:]  # use timestamp only, strip leading "-"
      Severity: Major
      Found in beem/utils.py - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                    return body + suffix
        Severity: Major
        Found in beem/utils.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

                      return body
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/utils.py - About 30 mins to fix

            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 18 to the 15 allowed.
            Open

            def derive_beneficiaries(beneficiaries):
            Severity: Critical
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

            See

            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 20 to the 15 allowed.
            Open

            def create_yaml_header(comment, json_metadata={}, reply_identifier=None):
            Severity: Critical
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

            See

            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 25 to the 15 allowed.
            Open

            def import_custom_json(jsonid, json_data):
            Severity: Critical
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

            See

            Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 24 to the 15 allowed.
            Open

            def derive_permlink(title, parent_permlink=None, parent_author=None,
            Severity: Critical
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

            See

            Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "291" or change one of the implementations.
            Open

                    items = list(obj.items())
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Having two branches in the same if structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4

            Compliant Solution

            if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4

            or 

            if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_third_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if "beneficiaries" in comment:
        beneficiaries = []
        for b in comment["beneficiaries"]:
            beneficiaries.append("%s:%.2f%%" % (b["account"], b["weight"] / 10000 * 100))
        if len(beneficiaries) > 0:
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
            beem/cli.py on lines 2568..2573

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 102.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if "percent_steem_dollars" in comment:
        yaml_prefix += 'percent_steem_dollars: %s\n' %  str(comment["percent_steem_dollars"])
    elif "percent_hbd" in comment:
        yaml_prefix += 'percent_hbd: %s\n' %  str(comment["percent_hbd"])
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
            beem/cli.py on lines 2560..2563

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 67.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if with_suffix:
            rem_chars = max_permlink_length - len(suffix) - len(prefix)
        else:
            rem_chars = max_permlink_length - len(prefix)
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            beem/utils.py on lines 135..138

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 45.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if with_suffix:
            rem_chars = max_permlink_length - len(suffix) - len(prefix)
        else:
            rem_chars = max_permlink_length - len(prefix)
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            beem/utils.py on lines 124..127

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 45.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if comment["title"] != "":
        yaml_prefix += 'title: "%s"\n' % comment["title"]
            Severity: Minor
            Found in beem/utils.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
            beem/cli.py on lines 2543..2544

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 35.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Rename function "addTzInfo" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def addTzInfo(t, timezone="UTC"):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            Rename function "formatToTimeStamp" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def formatToTimeStamp(t):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            Rename function "formatTimeFromNow" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def formatTimeFromNow(secs=0):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            Rename function "formatTime" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def formatTime(t):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            Rename function "formatTimeString" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def formatTimeString(t):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            Rename function "formatTimedelta" to match the regular expression ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,}$.
            Open

            def formatTimedelta(td):
            Severity: Major
            Found in beem/utils.py by sonar-python

            Shared coding conventions allow teams to collaborate efficiently. This rule checks that all function names match a provided regular expression.

            Noncompliant Code Example

            With the default provided regular expression: ^[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$

            def MyFunction(a,b):
    ...

            Compliant Solution

            def my_function(a,b):
    ...

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status