iostat/eav_hashes

View on GitHub

Showing 4 of 4 total issues

Method after_initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def after_initialize
        raise "key should be a string or symbol!" unless key.is_a? String or key.is_a? Symbol
        raise "value should not be empty!" if @value.is_a? String and value.empty?
        raise "value should not be nil!" if @value.nil?
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/eav_hashes/eav_entry.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fill_options_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.fill_options_hash(options)
        sanity_check options

        # Generate a unique class name based on the eav_hash's name and owner
        options[:entry_class_name] ||= "#{options[:parent_class_name]}_#{options[:hash_name]}_entry".camelize.to_sym
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/eav_hashes/util.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method save_entries has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def save_entries
        # The entries are lazy-loaded, so don't do anything if they haven't been accessed or modified
        return unless (@entries and @changes_made)

        @entries.values.each do |entry|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/eav_hashes/eav_hash.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run_find_expression has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.run_find_expression (key, value, options)
        sanity_check options
        raise "Can't search for a nil key!" if key.nil?
        if value.nil?
          options[:entry_class].where(
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/eav_hashes/util.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language