Sign upLogin

jarib/webidl

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 13 of 13 total issues

Method visit_operation has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def visit_operation(operation)
      if operation.name.empty?
        if operation.setter?
          meth = :[]=
        elsif operation.getter?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def build(parent)
        if respond_to?(:specials)
          special_list = specials.build unless specials.empty?
          operation    = op
        else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/operation.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method visit_operation has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def visit_operation(operation)
      if operation.name.empty?
        if operation.setter?
          meth = :[]=
        elsif operation.getter?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def build(parent = nil)
        return [] if metadef.empty?

        if metadef.d.any?
          p metadef.d unless metadef.d.respond_to? :build
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/definitions.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def visit_dictionary(dict)
      [:module, classify(dict.name),
        ([:scope, [:block] + dict.inherits.map { |inherit| [:call, nil, :include, [:arglist, inherit.accept(self)]] }] unless dict.inherits.empty?),
        [:scope,
          [:block] + dict.members.map { |m| m.accept(self) }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb on lines 14..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 44.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def visit_interface(intf)
      [:module, classify(intf.name),
        ([:scope, [:block] + intf.inherits.map { |inherit| [:call, nil, :include, [:arglist, inherit.accept(self)]] }] unless intf.inherits.empty?),
        [:scope,
          [:block] + intf.members.map { |m| m.accept(self) }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb on lines 23..29

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 44.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      module ParseTree
    class DictionaryMembers < Treetop::Runtime::SyntaxNode

      def build(parent)
        m = member.build(parent)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/dictionary_members.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/parse_tree/interface_members.rb on lines 2..16

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 37.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      module ParseTree
    class InterfaceMembers < Treetop::Runtime::SyntaxNode

      def build(parent)
        m = member.build(parent)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/interface_members.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/parse_tree/dictionary_members.rb on lines 2..16

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 37.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def build(parent)
        xattrs = eal.build(parent) unless eal.empty?

        options = {:extended_attributes => xattrs}
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/argument.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method classify has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def classify(string)
      s = string.to_s

      if s.include?("::")
        s.split("::").map { |e| classify(e) unless e.empty? }.compact.join("::").to_sym
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def build(parent)
        if type.respond_to?(:build)
          result = type.build(parent)
          if result.kind_of?(String)
            result = Ast::Type.new(parent, result)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/parse_tree/type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          [:defn, callback.name,
        [:args] + callback.arguments.map { |a| a.accept(self) },
        [:scope,
          [:block,
            [:call, nil, :raise,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb on lines 100..110

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 28.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          [:defn, meth.to_sym,
        [:args] + operation.args.map { |a| a.accept(self) },
        [:scope,
          [:block,
            [:call, nil, :raise,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
    lib/webidl/generator/ruby_sexp_visitor.rb on lines 64..74

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 28.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language