Sign upLogin

jejacks0n/navigasmic

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 9 of 11 total issues

Method item has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def item(label, *args, &block)
        options = args.extract_options!
        options = flatten_and_eval_options(options)
        return "" unless visible?(options)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/crumb_builder.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method flatten_and_eval_options has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def flatten_and_eval_options(options)
          remove_excluded_options(options)
          options.inject({}) do |hash, (key, value)|
            if value.is_a?(Array)
              value = value.map { |v| v.is_a?(Proc) ? eval_in_context(&v) : v }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/base.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method highlights_on? has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def highlights_on?(path, params)
      return false unless @rules.any?
      params = params.except(*unwanted_keys)
      !!@rules.detect do |rule|
        case rule
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/item.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method link_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def link_for(link, options)
          host = options.delete(:host) || @context.request.host
          if link.is_a?(Hash)
            link[:host] ||= host
          elsif link[0] == "/"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/map_builder.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method item has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def item(label, *args, &block)
        options = args.extract_options!
        options = flatten_and_eval_options(options)
        return "" unless visible?(options)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/list_builder.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method determine_link has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def determine_link(label, link)
          if link.blank?
            path_helper = "#{label.to_s.underscore.gsub(/\s/, '_')}_path"
            @context.send(path_helper) if @context.respond_to?(path_helper)
          elsif link.is_a?(Proc)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/base.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method group has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def group(label_or_options = nil, options = {}, &block)
        raise ArgumentError, "Missing block for group" unless block_given?
        if label_or_options.is_a?(Hash)
          options = label_or_options
          label_or_options = nil
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/list_builder.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method calculate_highlighting_rules has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def calculate_highlighting_rules(rules)
        [].tap do |highlighting_rules|
          if rules.nil?
            highlighting_rules << @link if link?
          else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/item.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method structure_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def structure_for(label, link, options, &block)
          content = content_tag(:loc, link_for(link, options))
          content << content_tag(:name, label)
          if opts = options.delete(@config.option_namespace)
            content << content_tag(:changefreq, opts[:changefreq] || @config.item_changefreq)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/navigasmic/builder/map_builder.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language