Showing 41 of 59 total issues
File gfcp.go
has 1436 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Package gfcp - A Fast and Reliable ARQ Protocol
//
// Copyright © 2021 Jeffrey H. Johnson <trnsz@pobox.com>.
// Copyright © 2015 Daniel Fu <daniel820313@gmail.com>.
// Copyright © 2019 Loki 'l0k18' Verloren <stalker.loki@protonmail.ch>.
File gfcp_sess.go
has 1283 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Copyright © 2021 Jeffrey H. Johnson <trnsz@pobox.com>.
// Copyright © 2015 Daniel Fu <daniel820313@gmail.com>.
// Copyright © 2019 Loki 'l0k18' Verloren <stalker.loki@protonmail.ch>.
// Copyright © 2021 Gridfinity, LLC. <admin@gridfinity.com>.
//
Method GFCP.Flush
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Flush(
ackOnly bool,
) uint32 {
Method UDPSession.GFcpInput
has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *UDPSession,
) GFcpInput(
data []byte,
) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GFCP.Flush
has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Flush(
ackOnly bool,
) uint32 {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GFCP.Input
has a Cognitive Complexity of 60 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Input(
data []byte,
regular,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GFCP.Input
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Input(
data []byte,
regular,
Method FecDecoder.Decode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
dec *FecDecoder,
) Decode(
in FecPacket,
) (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method FecDecoder.Decode
has 142 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
dec *FecDecoder,
) Decode(
in FecPacket,
) (
Method UDPSession.GFcpInput
has 133 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *UDPSession,
) GFcpInput(
data []byte,
) {
UDPSession
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UDPSession struct {
updaterIdx int // record slice index in updater
conn net.PacketConn // the underlying packet connection
GFcp *GFCP // GFCP ARQ protocol
l *Listener // pointing to the Listener object if it's been accepted by a Listener
Method GFCP.Send
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Send(
buffer []byte,
) int {
Method Snsi.Reset
has 96 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *Snsi) Reset() {
atomic.StoreUint64(
&s.GFcpBytesSent,
0,
)
Method UDPSession.Read
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *UDPSession,
) Read(
b []byte,
) (
Function newUDPSession
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newUDPSession(
conv uint32,
dataShards,
parityShards int,
l *Listener,
GFCP
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type GFCP struct {
conv, mtu, mss, state uint32
sndUna, sndNxt, rcvNxt uint32
ssthresh uint32
rxRttVar, rxSrtt int32
Method UDPSession.WriteBuffers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *UDPSession,
) WriteBuffers(
v [][]byte,
) (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GFCP.Recv
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) Recv(
buffer []byte,
) (
Method GFCP.parseData
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
GFcp *GFCP,
) parseData(
newGFcpSeg Segment,
) bool {
Method UDPSession.WriteBuffers
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *UDPSession,
) WriteBuffers(
v [][]byte,
) (